The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anaerobic threshold: review of the concept and directions for future research
Abstract
The concentration of lactate in the blood is the result of (1) those processes which produce lactate and contribute to its appearance in the blood and (2) those processes which catabolize lactate after its removal from the blood. Consequently, the concentration of lactate in the blood provides minimal information about the rate of lactate production in muscle. The accumulation of lactate beyond the lactate threshold [T(lact)] does provide an indication that the mechanisms of lactate removal fail to keep pace with lactate production. Lactate is produced in skeletal muscle as a direct result of increased metabolic rate and glycolytic carbon flow. Factors which influence lactate production in muscle include: the Vmax of lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), which is several times greater than the combined activities of enzymes which provide alternative pathways of pyruvate metabolism; the kM of LDH for pyruvate, which is sufficiently low to assure maximal stimulation of LDH in the conversion of pyruvate to lactate; and the K'eq of pyruvate to lactate conversion, which exceeds 1000. Recent studies on dog gracilis muscle in situ clearly indicate that lactate production occurs in contracting pure red muscle for reasons other than an O2 limitation on mitochondrial ATP production. In addition to failure of the essential assumption of the anaerobic threshold [T(an)] hypothesis that there exist limitations on O2 availability in muscles of healthy individuals during submaximal exercise, several groups of investigators have produced results which indicate that parameters associated with changes in pulmonary minute ventilation [i.e., the ventilatory threshold, T(vent)] do not always track changes in blood lactate concentration. Therefore, the T(an) hypothesis fails on the bases of theory and prediction. A series of kinetic tracer experiments to better understand lactate kinetics during exercise is proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing
(2003) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.167.2.211 · Cited by 3,026
Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance
BASSETT, D. R. (2000) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200001000-00012 · Cited by 2,410
The Science and Translation of Lactate Shuttle Theory
Brooks, G. A. (2018) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.008 · Cited by 1,486
Self-citationLactate Threshold Concepts: How Valid are They?
Faude, O., Kindermann, W., & Meyer, T. (2009) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200939060-00003 · Cited by 882
A comparison between three rating scales for perceived exertion and two different work tests
Borg, E., & Kaijser, L. (2006) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2005.00448.x · Cited by 558
Metadata
- Authors
- BROOKS, G. A.
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 1985-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22???31
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013351796
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anaerobic threshold: review of the concept and directions for future research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1249/00005768-198502000-00005
- The paper
- BROOKS, G. A. (1985). Anaerobic threshold: review of the concept and directions for future research. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-198502000-00005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.