The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of two regimens of concurrent strength and endurance training.
Abstract
To compare the responses to doing strength (S) training on alternate days with endurance (E) training vs doing both types of training on the same days per week, seven young men (group A-2 d) did S and E training together in single sessions 2 d.wk-1 for 20 wk. A second group (B-4 d, N = 8) did the S training on 2 d.wk-1 and E training on 2 other d.wk-1. S training was six to eight sets of 15-20 RM on a leg press weight machine. E training was six to eight 3-min bouts of cycle ergometer exercise at 90-100% VO2max. B-4 d (25%) increased leg press 1 RM more (P less than 0.05) than A-2 d (13%), but the groups increased similarly (A-2 d, B-4 d) in knee extensor (31%, 34%) and flexor (12%, 14%) cross-sectional area and vastus lateralis mean fiber area (33%, 25%). Increases in VO2max (7%, 6%), repetitions with 80% 1 RM (39%, 64%), repetitions with the pre-training 1 RM (33, 55), and PFK (19%, 10%) and LDH (15%, 23%) activity did not differ (P greater than 0.05) between groups. CS activity increased significantly only in A-2 d (26%; B-4 d, 6%). It is concluded that same day (vs different day) concurrent strength and endurance training may impede strength development without impeding hypertrophy. On the other hand, same day training may enhance increases in CS activity but not VO2max or weight lifting endurance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“longer training interventions (i.e., ≥20 weeks), have failed to observe any differences in myofibre CSA hypertrophy compared to resistance training (Sale et al., 1990; Häkkinen et al., 2003).”
From Myofibre Hypertrophy in the Absence of Changes to Satellite Cell Content Following Concurrent Exercise Training in Young Healthy Men (2021) · cites this paper as Sale et al., 1990
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Progression Models in Resistance Training for Healthy Adults
(2009) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3181915670 · Cited by 4,332
Progression Models in Resistance Training for Healthy Adults
(2002) · Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200202000-00027 · Cited by 2,979
“Studies using two (49,167), three (19,20,147,232,234), four to five (50,122, 131,177), and six or more (123,218) sets per exercise have all produced significant increases in muscular strength in both trained and untrained individuals.”
BackgroundKraemer, W. J., Patton, J. F., Gordon, S. E., Harman, E. A., Deschenes, M. R., Reynolds, K., Newton, R. U., Triplett, N. T., & Dziados, J. E. (1995) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1995.78.3.976 · Cited by 782
Molecular and cellular adaptation of muscle in response to exercise: perspectives of various models
Booth, F. W., & Thomason, D. B. (1991) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1991.71.2.541 · Cited by 703
A Meta-analysis to Determine the Dose Response for Strength Development
RHEA, M. R., ALVAR, B. A., BURKETT, L. N., & BALL, S. D. (2003) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000053727.63505.d4 · Cited by 666
Metadata
- Authors
- SALE, D. G., JACOBS, I., MACDOUGALL, J. D., & GARNER, S.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 1990-06
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 348???356
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055553543
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Keywords
- exercise frequency, leg press strength, muscle hypertrophy, cross-sectional area, VO2max, cycle ergometry, creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, young men
- MeSH terms
- Citrate (si)-Synthase, Physical Exertion, Humans, Male, Muscle Contraction, Muscles, Physical Education and Training, Physical Endurance, Weight Lifting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review