Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 771

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of landing stiffness on joint kinetics and energetics in the lower extremity

DEVITA, PAUL, SKELLY, WILLIAM A.·1992·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

DEVITA, P. and W. A. SKELLY. Effect of landing stiffness on joint kinetics and energetics in the lower extremity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 108–115, 1992. Ground reaction forces (GRF), joint positions, joint moments, and muscle powers in the lower extremity were compared between soft and stiff landings from a vertical tall of 59 cm. Soft and still‘ landings had less than and greater than 90 degrees of knee flexion after floor contact. Ten trials of sagittal plane film and GRF data, sampled at 100 and 1000 Hz, were obtained from each of eight female athletes and two landing conditions. Inverse dynamics were performed on these data to obtain the moments and powers during descent (free fall) and floor contact phases. Angular impulse and work values were calculated from these curves, and the conditions were compared with a correlated t-test. Soft and stiff landings averaged 117 and 77 degrees of knee flexion. Larger hip extensor (0.010 vs 0.019 N · m · s · kg-1; P < 0.01) and knee flexor (–0.010 vs –0.013 N · m · s · kg-1; P < 0.01) moments were observed during descent in the stiff landing, which produced a more erect body posture and a flexed knee position at impact. The shapes of the GRF, moment, and power curves were identical between landings. The stiff landing had larger GRFs, but only the ankle plantarflexors produced a larger moment (0.185 vs 0.232 N · m · s · kg-1; P < 0.01) in this condition. The hip and knee muscles absorbed more energy in the soft landing (hip, –0.60 vs –0.39 W · kg-1; P < 0.01; knee, –0.89 vs –0.61 W · kg-1; P < 0.01), while the ankle muscles absorbed more in the stiff landing (–0.88 vs –1.00 W · kg-1; P < 0.05). Overall, the muscular system absorbed 19% more of the body's kinetic energy in the soft landing compared with the stiff landing, reducing the impact stress on other body tissues. The ankle plantarflexors provided the major energy absorption function in both conditions, averaging 44% of the total muscular work done followed by the knee (34%) and hip (22%) extensors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/00005768-199201000-00018

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 771

Metadata

Authors
DEVITA, P., & SKELLY, W. A.
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
1992-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
108???115
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076544055
Cited by
771
References
8
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of landing stiffness on joint kinetics and energetics in the lower extremity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1249/00005768-199201000-00018
The paper
DEVITA, P., & SKELLY, W. A. (1992). Effect of landing stiffness on joint kinetics and energetics in the lower extremity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-199201000-00018

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.