The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of stimulation intensity on the physiological responses of human motor units
Abstract
Quadriceps femoris muscles were studied in 50 healthy subjects to determine the physiological responses of the motor units recruited at different force levels during transcutaneous electrical stimulation. During one set of experiments force-frequency relationships were compared at stimulation intensities that produced tetanic contraction of 20%, 50%, or 80% of the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVC). No differences in the normalized force-frequency relationship were observed between the 20% and 50% of MVC conditions and only a slight shift to the left was observed at 80% of MVC. The other set of experiments measured the responses to electrically elicited fatigue tests using frequencies of 20, 40, or 60 pps and, at each frequency, intensities that produced 20% or 50% of MVC. Fatigue was greater for the 50% than 20% MVC force conditions. Within each force level fatigue increased with increasing frequency. However, though the differences in the level of recruitment needed to produce the two forces varied for each frequency, the differences in the amount of fatigue produced at each force did not vary between the three stimulation frequencies. This suggests that the fatigue characteristics of the recruited motor units were similar at all intensities tested. We posit, therefore, that the physiological recruitment order during transcutaneous electrical stimulation is less orderly than previously suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Motor unit recruitment during neuromuscular electrical stimulation: a critical appraisal
Bickel, C. S., Gregory, C. M., & Dean, J. C. (2011) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-011-2128-4 · Cited by 391
Assessment of low-frequency fatigue with two methods of electrical stimulation
Martin, V., Millet, G. Y., Martin, A., Deley, G., & Lattier, G. (2004) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00376.2004 · Cited by 139
Catchlike property of skeletal muscle: Recent findings and clinical implications
Binder‐Macleod, S., & Kesar, T. (2005) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/mus.20290 · Cited by 78
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- BINDER-MACLEOD, S. A., HALDEN, E. E., & JUNGLES, K. A.
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 556???565
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076182585
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of stimulation intensity on the physiological responses of human motor units. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1249/00005768-199504000-00014
- The paper
- BINDER-MACLEOD, S. A., HALDEN, E. E., & JUNGLES, K. A. (1995). Effects of stimulation intensity on the physiological responses of human motor units. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-199504000-00014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.