Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Disordered Eating, Menstrual Irregularity, and Bone Mineral Density in Female Runners

COBB, KRISTIN L., BACHRACH, LAURA K., GREENDALE, GAIL, MARCUS, ROBERT, NEER, ROBERT M., NIEVES, JERI, FRAN SOWERS, MARY, BROWN, BYRON W., GOPALAKRISHNAN, GEETHA, LUETTERS, CRYSTAL, TANNER, HEATHER K., WARD, BRIDGET, KELSEY, JENNIFER L.·2003·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

COBB, K. L., L. K. BACHRACH, G. GREENDALE, R. MARCUS, R. M. NEER, J. NIEVES, M. F. SOWERS, B. W. BROWN, JR., G. GOPALAKRISHNAN, C. LUETTERS, H. K. TANNER, B. WARD, and J. L. KELSEY. Disordered Eating, Menstrual Irregularity, and Bone Mineral Density in Female Runners. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 711–719, 2003. Purpose: To examine the relationships between disordered eating, menstrual irregularity, and low bone mineral density (BMD) in young female runners. Methods: Subjects were 91 competitive female distance runners aged 18–26 yr. Disordered eating was measured by the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI). Menstrual irregularity was defined as oligo/amenorrhea (0–9 menses per year). BMD was measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry. Results: An elevated score on the EDI (highest quartile) was associated with oligo/amenorrhea, after adjusting for percent body fat, age, miles run per week, age at menarche, and dietary fat, (OR [95% CI]: 4.6 [1.1–18.6]). Oligo/amenorrheic runners had lower BMD than eumenorrheic runners at the spine (-5%), hip (-6%), and whole body (-3%), even after accounting for weight, percent body fat, EDI score, and age at menarche. Eumenorrheic runners with elevated EDI scores had lower BMD than eumenorrheic runners with normal EDI scores at the spine (-11%), with trends at the hip (-5%), and whole body (-5%), after adjusting for differences in weight and percent body fat. Runners with both an elevated EDI score and oligo/amenorrhea had no further reduction in BMD than runners with only one of these risk factors. Conclusion: In young competitive female distance runners, (i) disordered eating is strongly related to menstrual irregularity, (ii) menstrual irregularity is associated with low BMD, and (iii) disordered eating is associated with low BMD in the absence of menstrual irregularity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/01.mss.0000064935.68277.e7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
COBB, K. L., BACHRACH, L. K., GREENDALE, G., MARCUS, R., NEER, R. M., NIEVES, J., FRAN SOWERS, M., BROWN, B. W., GOPALAKRISHNAN, G., LUETTERS, C., TANNER, H. K., WARD, B., & KELSEY, J. L.
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2003-05
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
711-719
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162415573
Cited by
282
References
1
FWCI
14.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.