Energy Costs of Physical Activities in Children and Adolescents
Abstract
PURPOSE: The primary aim was to determine the energy expenditure (EE: kcal.kg(-1).h(-1)) in terms of caloric cost and metabolic equivalents of activities commonly performed by children and adolescents. Secondary aims were to determine at what age and pubertal developmental stage values approach those of adults. METHODS: In this descriptive study, 295 volunteer youth 8-18 yr of age completed 18 common physical activities (including rest) while EE was measured continuously with a portable metabolic system. Three sets of activities were assigned in random order for each subject. Activities ranged from television viewing and video game play to running and rope skipping. Pubertal development was estimated from a self-report questionnaire. RESULTS: At rest, VO(2) and EE were highest in the youngest children and decreased with advancing age and higher pubertal stage in both genders. The age-adjusted and puberty-adjusted energy expenditure values were generally lower than the compendium MET values for sedentary and moderate activities but were more varied for high-intensity activities. However, the ratio of activity EE to REE was comparable in children and adults. CONCLUSIONS: Energy expenditure per kilogram of body mass at rest or during exercise is greater in children than adults and varies with pubertal status, thus using the definition of a MET in the compendium of physical activities without adjustment is inadequate for energy estimation in children, until a child reaches Tanner Stage 5. However, the ratio of activity EE to resting EE in children appears to be similar or slightly less than in the compendium, suggesting that the compendium MET increments used with our adjusted EE values more closely approximate the true EE of activities in children than present adult norms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The assumptions underlying METs are not valid for children because they have a higher oxygen consumption relative to body mass at rest.
“The assumptions underlying METs are not valid for children as they have a higher oxygen consumption relative to body mass at rest [11]”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 374
- Authors
- HARRELL, J. S., MCMURRAY, R. G., BAGGETT, C. D., PENNELL, M. L., PEARCE, P. F., & BANGDIWALA, S. I.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 329-336
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143353462
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 10.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NR04564, R01NR004564)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Keywords
- energy expenditure, children, adolescents, metabolic equivalents, physical activity, puberty, resting energy expenditure, physical activity energy expenditure, age differences, sedentary behavior, video gaming, running, rope skipping, VO2
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Age Factors, Child, Child Welfare, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, Oxygen Consumption, Puberty, Exercise Tolerance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review