The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biomechanical Analysis of Double Poling in Elite Cross-Country Skiers
Abstract
PURPOSE: To further the understanding of double poling (DP) through biomechanical analysis of upper and lower body movements during DP in cross-country (XC) skiing at racing speed. METHODS: Eleven elite XC skiers performed DP at 85% of their maximal DP velocity (V85%) during roller skiing at 1 degrees inclination on a treadmill. Pole and plantar ground reaction forces, joint angles (elbow, hip, knee, and ankle), cycle characteristics, and electromyography (EMG) of upper and lower body muscles were analyzed. RESULTS: 1) Pole force pattern with initial impact force peak and the following active force peak (PPF) correlated to V85%, (r = 0.66, P < 0.05); 2) active flexion-extension pattern in elbow, hip, knee, and ankle joints with angle minima occurring around PPF, correlated to hip angle at pole plant (r = -0.89, P < 0.01), minimum elbow angle (r = -0.71), and relative poling time (r = -0.72, P < 0.05); 3) two different DP strategies (A and B), where strategy A (best skiers) was characterized by higher angular elbow- and hip-flexion velocities, smaller minimum elbow (P < 0.01) and hip angles (P < 0.05), and higher PPF (P < 0.05); 4) EMG activity in trunk and hip flexors, shoulder, and elbow extensors, and several lower body muscles followed a specific sequential pattern with changing activation levels; and 5) EMG activity in lower body muscles showed DP requires more than upper body work. CONCLUSIONS: DP was found to be a complex movement involving both the upper and lower body showing different strategies concerning several biomechanical aspects. Future research should further investigate the relationship between biomechanical and physiological variables and elaborate training models to improve DP performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Role of glycogen availability in sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ kinetics in human skeletal muscle
Ørtenblad, N., Nielsen, J., Saltin, B., & Holmberg, H. (2011) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2010.195982 · Cited by 225
Self-citationNielsen, J., Gejl, K. D., Hey‐Mogensen, M., Holmberg, H., Suetta, C., Krustrup, P., Elemans, C. P. H., & Ørtenblad, N. (2017) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp273040 · Cited by 191
Nielsen, J., Holmberg, H., Schrøder, H. D., Saltin, B., & Ørtenblad, N. (2011) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2010.204487 · Cited by 122
Self-citationØrtenblad, N., Nielsen, J., Boushel, R., Söderlund, K., Saltin, B., & Holmberg, H.-C. (2018) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.01031 · Cited by 102
Self-citationEnergy system contribution during competitive cross-country skiing
Losnegard, T. (2019) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-019-04158-x · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- HOLMBERG, H.-C., LINDINGER, S., ST??GGL, T., EITZLMAIR, E., & M??LLER, E.
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 807-818
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2151129595
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomechanical Analysis of Double Poling in Elite Cross-Country Skiers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1249/01.mss.0000162615.47763.c8
- The paper
- HOLMBERG, H.-C., LINDINGER, S., ST??GGL, T., EITZLMAIR, E., & M??LLER, E. (2005). Biomechanical Analysis of Double Poling in Elite Cross-Country Skiers. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000162615.47763.c8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.