Self-Perceived Barriers to Activity Participation among Sedentary Adolescent Girls
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: Potential barriers to activity participation were surveyed among adolescent girls and corroborated with other reported information. METHODS: Among 2379 black and white girls enrolled in the NHLBI Growth and Health Study since ages 9 or 10 yr, those reporting weekly activity frequency as "sometimes" or "rarely" were surveyed for three consecutive years from ages 16 or 17 yr. Barriers to activity were assessed using a 10-item questionnaire. Responses were cross-examined with other reported information. Race-specific longitudinal regression examined the impact of barrier scores on activity levels and also potential factors having an impact on barrier scores. RESULTS: Approximately half of the cohort was screened as "sedentary" with a trend toward an increasing proportion with age. Lack of time was cited by 60% of sedentary girls as the leading barrier to activity participation for all 3 yr. Other frequently cited barriers to activity included "I'm too tired" and "They don't interest me." No differences were seen in hours at work or in household chores between those who cited lack of time and those who did not. Barrier score was a significant predictor of habitual activity scores. For both races, body mass index and "would rather do other things than exercise" were significant predictors of barriers, but work, parental education, TV watching, and childbirth were not significant. CONCLUSION: Self-reported barriers to activity participation among sedentary girls were shown to be primarily internal and uncorrelated with other corresponding external factors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Kimm's study was conducted in the USA and identified barriers such as embarrassment and no one to go with.
“The study by Kimm [52] was conducted in the USA and barriers such as ‘embarrassment’ and ‘no one to go with’ were identified.”
From Barriers to voluntary participation in sport for children: a systematic review (2018) · cites this paper as [52]
Findings from Armentrout and Kimm may be difficult to apply outside their research context because one study is sport specific and the other is gender specific.
“Although the findings from both studies may be difficult to apply outside of their research context as one study is sport specific and the other is gender specific.”
From Barriers to voluntary participation in sport for children: a systematic review (2018) · cites this paper as [52]
Armentrout and Kimm made use of surveys and the relationship between researcher and participant in the quality appraisal was scored as 'no'; this is unlikely to affect the quality of these studies given the surveys would have been completed by participants independent of the researcher.
“Armentrout [51] and Kimm [52] made use of surveys and the relationship between researcher and participant in the quality appraisal was scored as ‘no’, this is unlikely to affect the quality of these studies given the surveys would have been completed by the participants independent of the researcher.”
From Barriers to voluntary participation in sport for children: a systematic review (2018) · cites this paper as [52]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 128
- Authors
- KIMM, S. Y. S., GLYNN, N. W., MCMAHON, R. P., VOORHEES, C. C., STRIEGEL-MOORE, R. H., & DANIELS, S. R.
- Affiliations
- University of New Mexico (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 534-540
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070160293
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 1.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Wesleyan University Digital Collections (Wesleyan University) (submittedVersion)
- WESLEYAN
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (n01hc055023-022)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01 HL 48941-44, U01HL048941, N0-HC 55023-26)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
- Keywords
- barriers to physical activity, sedentary behavior, adolescent girls, time constraints, body mass index, exercise preferences, racial differences, physical activity behavior
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Health, Black or African American, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Life Style, Longitudinal Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Disclosure, United States, Cohort Studies, Exercise, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review