The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Body Mass Index as a Predictor of Percent Fat in College Athletes and Nonathletes
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Body mass index (BMI) is used as a surrogate for percent fat (% fat) in classifying obesity. However, there is no established criterion for % fat and health risk, and few studies have examined the accuracy/validity of BMI as a measure of % fat. By default, BMI is used to classify athletes and young adults as obese. Consequently, it is critical to understand the accuracy of BMI in these populations. The purposes of this study were 1) to describe the relationship between BMI and % fat, and 2) to determine the accuracy of BMI as a measure of % fat in college athletes and nonathletes. METHODS: A total of 226 college-aged athletes and 213 college-aged nonathletes participated. Three male groups (athletes, football linemen, and nonathletes) and two female groups (athletes and nonathletes) were created. BMI was calculated. Percent fat was determined via BOD POD. BMI >or= 25 kg.m(-2) was used to define overweight. Twenty percent fat for males and 33% fat for females were used to define overfatness. Using % fat as the criterion, sensitivity and specificity of BMI were calculated. Receiver operator characteristic curves determined optimal BMI cut points for % fat. RESULTS: Sensitivity was high (0.83-1.0) and specificity was low (0.27-0.66) in male athletes, male nonathletes, and female athletes. Sensitivity was high in linemen (1.0). Sensitivity was low (0.56) and specificity was high (0.90) in female nonathletes. Optimal BMI cut points for male athletes, linemen, male nonathletes, female athletes, and female nonathletes were 27.9, 34.1, 26.5, 27.7, and 24.0 kg.m(-2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BMI should be used cautiously when classifying fatness in college athletes and nonathletes. Our results support the need for different BMI classifications of overweight in these populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Healthy percentage body fat ranges: an approach for developing guidelines based on body mass index
Gallagher, D., Heymsfield, S. B., Heo, M., Jebb, S. A., Murgatroyd, P. R., & Sakamoto, Y. (2000) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/72.3.694 · Cited by 2,139
Reassessment of body mass indices
Smalley, K., Knerr, A., Kendrick, Z., Colliver, J., & Owen, O. (1990) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/52.3.405 · Cited by 306
Cited by
Garvey, W. T., Mechanick, J. I., Brett, E. M., Garber, A. J., Hurley, D. L., Jastreboff, A. M., Nadolsky, K., Pessah-Pollack, R., & Plodkowski, R. (2016) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep161365.gl · Cited by 1,914
Okorodudu, D. O., Jumean, M. F., Montori, V. M., Romero-Corral, A., Somers, V. K., Erwin, P. J., & Lopez-Jimenez, F. (2010) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2010.5 · Cited by 1,028
Leeners, B., Geary, N., Tobler, P. N., & Asarian, L. (2017) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmw045 · Cited by 407
Neilson, H. K., Friedenreich, C. M., Brockton, N. T., & Millikan, R. C. (2009) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-08-0756 · Cited by 232
Rapuano, K. M., Huckins, J. F., Sargent, J. D., Heatherton, T. F., & Kelley, W. M. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv097 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- ODE, J. J., PIVARNIK, J. M., REEVES, M. J., & KNOUS, J. L.
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 403-409
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000111445
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Body Mass Index as a Predictor of Percent Fat in College Athletes and Nonathletes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1249/01.mss.0000247008.19127.3e
- The paper
- ODE, J. J., PIVARNIK, J. M., REEVES, M. J., & KNOUS, J. L. (2007). Body Mass Index as a Predictor of Percent Fat in College Athletes and Nonathletes. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000247008.19127.3e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.