Cited by 230Sports Performance and TrainingLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Altered Running Economy Directly Translates to Altered Distance-Running Performance

HOOGKAMER, WOUTER, KIPP, SHALAYA, SPIERING, BARRY A., KRAM, RODGER·2016·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our goal was to quantify if small (1%-3%) changes in running economy quantitatively affect distance-running performance. Based on the linear relationship between metabolic rate and running velocity and on earlier observations that added shoe mass increases metabolic rate by ~1% per 100 g per shoe, we hypothesized that adding 100 and 300 g per shoe would slow 3000-m time-trial performance by 1% and 3%, respectively. METHODS: Eighteen male sub-20-min 5-km runners completed treadmill testing, and three 3000-m time trials wearing control shoes and identical shoes with 100 and 300 g of discreetly added mass. We measured rates of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production and calculated metabolic rates for the treadmill tests, and we recorded overall running time for the time trials. RESULTS: Adding mass to the shoes significantly increased metabolic rate at 3.5 m·s by 1.11% per 100 g per shoe (95% confidence interval = 0.88%-1.35%). While wearing the control shoes, participants ran the 3000-m time trial in 626.1 ± 55.6 s. Times averaged 0.65% ± 1.36% and 2.37% ± 2.09% slower for the +100-g and +300-g shoes, respectively (P < 0.001). On the basis of a linear fit of all the data, 3000-m time increased 0.78% per added 100 g per shoe (95% confidence interval = 0.52%-1.04%). CONCLUSION: Adding shoe mass predictably degrades running economy and slows 3000-m time-trial performance proportionally. Our data demonstrate that laboratory-based running economy measurements can accurately predict changes in distance-running race performance due to shoe modifications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/mss.0000000000001012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 230

Authors
HOOGKAMER, W., KIPP, S., SPIERING, B. A., & KRAM, R.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2016-11
Volume
48
Issue
11
Pages
2175-2180
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2473253176
Cited by
230
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14
FWCI
19.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
running economy, distance running performance, metabolic rate, oxygen consumption, running speed, footwear modification
MeSH terms
Energy Metabolism, Equipment Design, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Endurance, Running, Shoes, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review