Effects of two years of calorie restriction on aerobic capacity and muscle strength
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: Calorie restriction (CR) improves health span and delays age-related diseases in many species. The multicenter Comprehensive Assessment of Long-term Effects of Reducing Intake of Energy (CALERIE) study was the first randomized controlled trial of CR in nonobese humans. The aim of this investigation was to determine the effects of CR on V˙O2max and muscle strength in the CALERIE trial. METHODS: Healthy, normal-weight, and mildly overweight women and men (n = 218, mean ± SE age = 37.9 ± 0.5 yr) were randomized to 25% CR or an ad libitum (AL) control condition in a 2:1 allocation (143 CR, 75 AL). V˙O2max was determined with an incremental treadmill test; the strength of the knee flexors and extensors was assessed by dynamometry at baseline, 1 yr, and 2 yr. RESULTS: The CR group achieved an average 11.9% ± 0.7% CR during the 2-yr intervention. Body weight decreased in CR (-7.7 ± 0.4 kg), but not AL (+0.2 ± 0.5 kg). Absolute V˙O2max (L·min) decreased at 1 and 2 yr with CR, whereas V˙O2max expressed relative to body mass increased at both time points (1 yr: +2.2 ± 0.4; 2 yr: +1.9 ± 0.5 mL·kg·min) and relative to AL. The CR group increased their treadmill test time and workload at 1 and 2 yr. Strength results in CR were similar, with decreases in absolute flexor and extensor strength, but increases when expressed relative to body mass. No changes were observed for V˙O2max expressed relative to lean body mass or leg lean mass. CONCLUSIONS: Two years of modest CR without a structured exercise component did not appear to compromise aerobic capacity in healthy nonobese adults. The clinical implications of the observed changes in V˙O2max and muscle strength will be important to explore in future studies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two years of 25% caloric restriction in humans significantly increases relative VO2max compared with ad libitum controls.
“In fact, 2 years of 25% CR in humans results in a significant increase in relative VO2max (mL/kg/min) compared to ad libitum controls.148”
From Hormonal and Metabolic Changes of Aging and the Influence of Lifestyle Modifications (2021) · cites this paper as [148]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 58
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [1]American College of Sports Medicine ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription 9 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2014
- [15]Huber PJ Ronchetti EM Robust Statistics 2 Hoboken, N.J Wiley 2009
- Authors
- RACETTE, S. B., ROCHON, J., UHRICH, M. L., VILLAREAL, D. T., DAS, S. K., FONTANA, L., BHAPKAR, M., MARTIN, C. K., REDMAN, L. M., FUSS, P. J., ROBERTS, S. B., & KRAUS, W. E.
- Affiliations
- Tufts University (US)
- Rho (United States) (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
- Duke Clinical Research Institute (US)
- Duke University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2240-2249
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5647115
- OpenAlex
- W2673669472
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 7.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (U01AG020478, U01AG020487, U24AG047121, U01AG020480, U01AG022132)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092950, P30DK056341, P30DK072476)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
- Keywords
- caloric restriction, cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, knee flexor and extensor strength, non-obese adults, weight loss, relative strength, treadmill exercise testing, lean body mass
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Dietary Proteins, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Endurance, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Caloric Restriction, Overweight, Muscle Strength, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review