Cited by 32Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsPhysical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Personal activity intelligence e-health program in people with type 2 diabetes: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Open access
COOMBES, JEFF S., KEATING, SHELLEY E., MIELKE, GREGORE I., FASSETT, ROBERT G., COOMBES, BROOKE K., O’LEARY, KAITLYN P., COX, EMILY R., BURTON, NICOLA W.·2022·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Innovative strategies are needed to enable people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) to self-manage physical activity (PA). Personal Activity Intelligence (PAI) is a new metric that uses the heart rate response to PA to inform the user as to whether they are doing enough PA to reduce the risk of premature mortality. The PAI score reflects PA over the previous 7 d with the goal to maintain a score ≥100. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of the PAI e-Health Program in people with T2D. METHODS: Thirty participants with T2D who were not meeting PA guidelines were randomly assigned to 12 wk of either 1) PAI e-Health Program or 2) PA attention control. The PAI e-Health Program consisted of receiving a wrist-worn heart rate monitor and an app with the PAI metric, and attending 4 × 2 h·wk-1 sessions of exercise and counseling. Feasibility and acceptability of the program were evaluated by achievement of a PAI score ≥100 and participant feedback. Efficacy was determined from changes in glycemic control, cardiorespiratory fitness, exercise capacity (time-on-test), body composition, sleep time, and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: Program participants in the PAI e-Health Program had a mean ± SD PAI score of 119.7 ± 60.6 and achieved ≥100 PAI on 56.4% of the days. The majority of participants (80%) intended to continue to use PAI monitoring. Compared with control, the PAI group significantly improved their exercise capacity (mean difference, 95% confidence interval) (63 s, 17.9-108.0 s), sleep time (67.2 min, 7.2-127.1 min), total percent body fat (-1.3%, -2.6% to -0.1%), and gynoid fat percent (-1.5%, -2.6 to -0.5). CONCLUSIONS: The PAI e-Health Program is feasible, acceptable, and efficacious in people with T2D.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/mss.0000000000002768

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared with traditional approaches that rely on recall or paper-based records, digital wearable devices provide continuous and objective tracking of step counts, activity duration, heart rate, and energy expenditure, thereby converting exercise behavior into visible and quantifiable information.

    “Compared with traditional approaches that rely on recall or paper-based records, digital wearable devices provide continuous and objective tracking of step counts, activity duration, heart rate, and energy expenditure, thereby converting exercise behavior into visible and quantifiable information (14, 16–18).”

    From Behavior change pathways by which digital wearable devices support exercise self-management in type 2 diabetes: a scoping review with machine learning–assisted text mining (2026) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Methods describe a wrist-worn monitor that measures heart rate and an app that provides numerical PAI-score feedback; the accelerometer measures time spent at different activity intensities (Methods, page unavailable). The paper does not establish that the wearable tracks step counts or energy expenditure, or compare its tracking with recall or paper-based records. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 32

Authors
COOMBES, J. S., KEATING, S. E., MIELKE, G. I., FASSETT, R. G., COOMBES, B. K., O’LEARY, K. P., COX, E. R., & BURTON, N. W.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Centre for Research on Exercise, Physical Activity and Health, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, AUSTRALIA
  • Griffith University (AU)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2021-08-02
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
18-27
ISSN
  • 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0315
OpenAlex
W3189705390
Cited by
32
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
Diabetes Australia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, physical activity, heart rate monitoring, self-management, exercise capacity, sleep duration, body composition, glycemic control, cardiorespiratory fitness, health-related quality of life, feasibility and acceptability
MeSH terms
Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Exercise Therapy, Feasibility Studies, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Exercise, Telemedicine, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review