Epidemiology of Walking and Type 2 Diabetes
Abstract
PURPOSE: Diabetes is prevalent, deadly, serious, and costly. It affects an estimated 20.8 million Americans in 2005, having doubled from 1980, and is expected to reach at least 29 million by 2050. In 2002, diabetes was responsible for an estimated $132 billion in costs. Diabetes concerns leaders in public health and clinicians, and its personal, social, and economic burdens require preventive efforts such as the promotion of walking. As such, we reviewed the limited epidemiologic data of walking and incident diabetes (two studies) and walking and mortality outcomes among diabetic persons (three studies). METHODS: We abstracted information from each paper to identify characteristics of the study population, details of the disease outcomes (diabetes incidence, mortality outcomes, or cardiovascular disease events among persons with diabetes), relative risks, risk reductions, and adjustment for covariates. RESULTS: The reviewed studies were adjusted for important covariates such as age, body mass index, the coexistence of other nonwalking and vigorous activities, and so on and for biases such as differential misclassification of exposure. The strength of the observed reductions in risk were between approximately 20% and 40% for incident diabetes and between 40% and 55% for mortality due to all causes and due to cardiovascular disease (and related nonfatal events). Moderate to faster pace of walking seemed to enhance risk reduction. These reductions fit well with results of earlier reviews of physical activity and diabetes, and basically corresponded to 2-3 h of weekly walking. CONCLUSION: Available dose-response data between walking and the aforementioned outcomes suggest that public health recommendations for physical activity might also apply to walking in particular. Regardless, important areas remain for future research on walking and diabetes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In patients with diabetes, 3 to 7 hours of walking per week can decrease mortality and cardiovascular disease events by 40% to 55%.
“Based on allcause mortality and CVD events in diabetics from the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study and Nurse's Health Study, 3-7 hours of walking a week can result in decreased mortality and CVD events by 40-55%.”
From The Impact of Physical Activity in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (2025) · cites this paper as [63]
The walking studies were observational, so their impacts on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes cannot be directly causational.
“Of note, these studies were observational trials, and therefore, the impacts of walking cannot be directly causational to the mentioned outcomes.”
From The Impact of Physical Activity in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (2025) · cites this paper as [63]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 36
- Authors
- CASPERSEN, C. J., & FULTON, J. E.
- Affiliations
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
- ORCID
- FULTON, JANET E.
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- S519-S528
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006357310
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- walking, type 2 diabetes, diabetes incidence, diabetes mortality, cardiovascular disease, physical activity, walking speed, dose-response relationship, physical activity guidelines, public health prevention
- MeSH terms
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Angiopathies, Energy Metabolism, Health Promotion, Humans, Prediabetic State, Public Health, Health Behavior, Bias, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Incidence, Walking, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review