Cited by 25Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingExercise and Physiological Responses

Timing Protein Intake Increases Energy Expenditure 24 h after Resistance Training

HACKNEY, KYLE J., BRUENGER, ADAM J., LEMMER, JEFFREY T.·2010·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether protein supplementation (PRO) before an acute bout of heavy resistance training (HRT) would influence postexercise resting energy expenditure (REE) and the nonprotein respiratory exchange ratio (RER). HYPOTHESIS: REE would be increased and RER would be decreased up to 48 h after timed PRO and HRT compared with CHO supplementation and HRT. METHODS: Eight resistance-trained subjects (five men and three women) participated in a double-blind two-trial crossover design, where REE and RER were measured (7:00 a.m.) on four consecutive days. On the second day of trial 1, subjects consumed 376 kJ of either PRO (18 g of whey protein, 2 g of carbohydrate, 1.5 g of fat) or CHO (1 g of whey protein, 19 g of carbohydrate, 1 g of fat) 20 min before a single bout of HRT (nine exercises, 4 sets, 70%-75% 1-repetition maximum). REE and RER were measured 24 and 48 h after HRT. During trial 2, the same protocol was followed except subjects consumed the second supplement before HRT. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, REE was elevated significantly in both CHO and PRO at 24 and 48 h after HRT (P < 0.05). At 24 h after HRT, REE in response to PRO was significantly greater compared with CHO (P < 0.05). RER decreased significantly in both CHO and PRO at 24 h after HRT compared with baseline (P < 0.05). No differences were observed in total energy intake, macronutrient intake, or HRT volume (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Timing PRO before HRT may be a simple and effective strategy to increase energy expenditure by elevating REE the day after HRT. Increasing REE could facilitate reductions in body fat mass and improve body composition if nutritional intake is stable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/mss.0b013e3181c12976

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 25

Authors
HACKNEY, K. J., BRUENGER, A. J., & LEMMER, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • University of Central Arkansas (US)
  • Grand Valley State University (US)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2010-05
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
998-1003
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972417143
Cited by
25
References
38
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
protein supplementation, whey protein, resistance training, resting energy expenditure, respiratory exchange ratio, carbohydrate supplementation, post-exercise recovery, body composition
MeSH terms
Adult, Dietary Proteins, Double-Blind Method, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Male, Cross-Over Studies, Resistance Training, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review