The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing Physical Activity Using Wearable Monitors: Measures of Physical Activity
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Physical activity may be defined broadly as "all bodily actions produced by the contraction of skeletal muscle that increase energy expenditure above basal level." Physical activity is a complex construct that can be classified into major categories qualitatively, quantitatively, or contextually. The quantitative assessment of physical activity using wearable monitors is grounded in the measurement of energy expenditure. Six main categories of wearable monitors are currently available to investigators: pedometers, load transducers/foot-contact monitors, accelerometers, HR monitors, combined accelerometer and HR monitors, and multiple sensor systems. BEST PRACTICES: Currently available monitors are capable of measuring total physical activity as well as components of physical activity that play important roles in human health. The selection of wearable monitors for measuring physical activity will depend on the physical activity component of interest, study objectives, characteristics of the target population, and study feasibility in terms of cost and logistics. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Future development of sensors and analytical techniques for assessing physical activity should focus on the dynamic ranges of sensors, comparability for sensor output across manufacturers, and the application of advanced modeling techniques to predict energy expenditure and classify physical activities. New approaches for qualitatively classifying physical activity should be validated using direct observation or recording. New sensors and methods for quantitatively assessing physical activity should be validated in laboratory and free-living populations using criterion methods of calorimetry or doubly labeled water.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
Compendium of Physical Activities: Classification of energy costs of human physical activities
AINSWORTH, B. E., HASKELL, W. L., LEON, A. S., JACOBS, D. R., MONTOYE, H. J., SALLIS, J. F., & PAFFENBARGER, R. S. (1993) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/00005768-199301000-00011 · Cited by 4,102
Scaling Why is animal size so important?
Schmidt‐Nielsen, K. (1984) · Cited by 2,654
Kleiber, M. (1947) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1947.27.4.511 · Cited by 1,817
Validation and Calibration of Physical Activity Monitors in Children
Puyau, M. R., Adolph, A. L., Vohra, F. A., & Butte, N. F. (2002) · Obesity Research · doi:10.1038/oby.2002.24 · Cited by 1,013
Self-citationThe Technology of Accelerometry-Based Activity Monitors: Current and Future
CHEN, K. Y., & BASSETT, D. R. (2005) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000185571.49104.82 · Cited by 996
Accelerometry: A technique for quantifying movement patterns during walking
Kavanagh, J. J., & Menz, H. B. (2008) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.10.010 · Cited by 661
Physical Activity Assessment With Accelerometers: An Evaluation Against Doubly Labeled Water
Plasqui, G., & Westerterp, K. R. (2007) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2007.281 · Cited by 654
Self-citationAccuracy and Reliability of 10 Pedometers for Measuring Steps over a 400-m Walk
SCHNEIDER, P. L., Crouter, S. E., Lukajic, O., & Bassett, D. R. (2003) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000089342.96098.c4 · Cited by 633
Development of a Compendium of Energy Expenditures for Youth.
Ridley, K., Ainsworth, B. E., & Olds, T. (2008) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-5-45 · Cited by 622
How to assess physical activity? How to assess physical fitness?
Vanhees, L., Lefevre, J., Philippaerts, R. M., Martens, M., Huygens, W., Troosters, T., & Beunen, G. P. (2005) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/01.hjr.0000161551.73095.9c · Cited by 595
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An official European Respiratory Society statement on physical activity in COPD
Watz, H., Pitta, F., Rochester, C. L., Garcia-Aymerich, J., ZuWallack, R., Troosters, T., Vaes, A. W., Puhan, M. A., Jehn, M., Polkey, M. I., et al. (2014) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00046814 · Cited by 526
The Current State of Physical Activity Assessment Tools
Ainsworth, B. E., Cahalin, L. P., Buman, M. P., & Ross, R. (2014) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2014.10.005 · Cited by 509
The emerging clinical role of wearables: Factors for successful implementation in healthcare
Smuck, M., Odonkor, C. A., Wilt, J. K., Schmidt, N., & Swiernik, M. A. (2021) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00418-3 · Cited by 393
Dowd, K. P., Szeklicki, R., Minetto, M. A., Murphy, M. H., Polito, A., Ghigo, E., van der Ploeg, H., Ekelund, U., Maciaszek, J., Stemplewski, R., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-017-0636-2 · Cited by 385
“Y Score = 5 Butte et al. (2012) [40] 1.”
Self-citationActigraph GT3X: Validation and Determination of Physical Activity Intensity Cut Points
Santos‐Lozano, A., Santín-Medeiros, F., Cardon, G., Torres‐Luque, G., Bailón, R., Bergmeir, C., Ruiz, J. R., Lucía, A., & Garatachea, N. (2013) · International Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-0033-1337945 · Cited by 388
Metadata
- Authors
- BUTTE, N. F., EKELUND, U., & WESTERTERP, K. R.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1S
- Pages
- S5-S12
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2329242152
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- physical activity measurement, wearable monitors, accelerometer, pedometers, heart rate monitors, energy expenditure, physical activity classification, sensor validation, doubly labeled water, calorimetry
- MeSH terms
- Energy Metabolism, Humans, Motor Activity, Exercise, Monitoring, Ambulatory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review