Use of a Two-Regression Model for Estimating Energy Expenditure in Children
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop two new two-regression models (2RM), for use in children, that estimate energy expenditure (EE) using the ActiGraph GT3X: 1) mean vector magnitude (VM) counts or 2) vertical axis (VA) counts. The new 2RMs were also compared with existing ActiGraph equations for children. METHODS: Fifty-seven boys and 52 girls (mean ± SD: age = 11 ± 1.7 yr, body mass index = 21.4 ± 5.5 kg·m(-2)) performed 30-min supine rest and 8 min of six different activities ranging from sedentary behaviors to vigorous physical activity. Eighteen activities were split into three routines with each routine performed by 38-39 participants. Seventy-seven participants were used for the development group, and 39 participants were used for the cross-validation group. During all testing, activity data were collected using an ActiGraph GT3X, worn on the right hip, and oxygen consumption was measured using a Cosmed K4b. All energy expenditure values are expressed as MET(RMR) (activity VO(2)/resting VO(2)). RESULTS: For each activity, a coefficient of variation was calculated using 10-s epochs for the VA and VM to determine whether the activity was continuous walking/running or an intermittent lifestyle activity. Separate regression equations were developed for walking/running and intermittent lifestyle activity. In the cross-validation group, the VM and VA 2RMs were within 0.8 MET(RMR) of measured MET(RMR) for all activities except Sportwall and running (all P > 0.05). The other existing ActiGraph equations had mean errors ranging from 0.0 to 2.6 MET(RMR) for the activities. CONCLUSIONS: The new 2RMs for use in children with the ActiGraph GT3X provide a closer estimate of mean measured MET(RMR) than other currently available prediction equations. In addition, they improve the individual prediction errors across a wide range of activity intensities.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent work indicates a strong correlation between counts from the vertical axis and counts combined from all three axes using vector magnitude; thus, vector magnitude data may not provide much additional information beyond vertical axis counts.
“Recent work indicates a strong correlation between counts from the vertical axis and counts combined from all three axes using vector magnitude; thus, the vector magnitude data may not provide much additional information beyond vertical axis counts.[46]”
From Using accelerometers to measure physical activity in large-scale epidemiological studies: issues and challenges (2014) · cites this paper as [46]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 75
- Authors
- CROUTER, S. E., HORTON, M., & BASSETT, D. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1177-1185
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3324667
- OpenAlex
- W2083985411
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R21HL093407)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- energy expenditure estimation, children, ActiGraph GT3X+, accelerometry, physical activity intensity, walking and running, prediction equations, oxygen consumption
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Calorimetry, Indirect, Child, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Male, Monitoring, Physiologic, Oxygen Consumption, Regression Analysis, Body Mass Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review