The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Plasma Catecholamine Levels in the Coronary Sinus, Aorta and Femoral Vein of Subjects Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization at Rest and During Exercise.
Open accessAbstract
Plasma catecholamine (CA) levels in the coronary sinus (CS), aorta (Ao) and femoral vein (fv) were simultaneously measured in 22 patients with various heart diseases at rest and during handgrip exercise (IHG). The mean resting levels of plasma norepinephine (NE) in CS, Ao and FV were 359 +/- 49 (SEM) pg/ml, 290 +/- 27 and 234 +/- 24, respectively. The corresponding values of epinephrine (E) were 127 +/- 18 pg/ml, 186+/- 30 and 97 +/- 11, respectively. The E values in Ao were significantly greater than those in CS and in FV (p less than 0.05). IHG exercise induced an obvious elevation of plasma CA levels in every portion of the circulation studied. The mean increments of NE concentration were 81%, 54% and 67% of the resting levels at CS, Ao and FV, respectively, while IHG induced elevation of E were 70% of the resting values at each portion studied. Significant correlations were observed between individual CA concentrations in CS and in Ao, and also between those in Ao and in FV at rest. Under raised sympathoadrenal conditions, however, individual values of NE in CS failed to correlate signficantly to those in Ao and in FV, respectively. The NE output from CS was limited to only 3% and 5% of those in Ao at rest and during IHG, respectively. An actual mean increment of NE on its passing through the coronary circulation was only 2% or less of NE output in ao at both stages. It appears, thus, to be untenable that the cardiac tissue is one of the major source of circulating CA at physiological condition. From these reasons, the direct measurement of NE levels in CS may be mandatory, when plasma CA assay is designed for the purpose of studying the role of the sympathetic nerve activity in the regulation of cardiac function.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The extremity is an organ of epinephrine uptake (and net norepinephrine release).
“to the extent that the extremity is an organ of epinephrine uptake (and net norepinephrine [NE] release), as suggested by arteriovenous concentration differences (23)”
From Epinephrine plasma metabolic clearance rates and physiologic thresholds for metabolic and hemodynamic actions in man. (1980) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clutter, W. E., Bier, D. M., Shah, S. D., & Cryer, P. E. (1980) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci109840 · Cited by 576
Metadata
- Authors
- MIURA, Y., HANEDA, T., SATO, T., MIYAZAWA, K., SAKUMA, H., KOBAYASHI, K., MINAI, K., SHIRATO, K., HONNA, T., TAKISHIMA, T., & YOSHINAGA, K.
- Venue
- Japanese Circulation Journal
- Publisher
- Japanese Circulation Society
- Published
- 1976
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 929-934
- ISSN
- 0047-1828 (ISSN-L)
- 1347-4839
- OpenAlex
- W2025164069
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Japanese Circulation Journal-english Edition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Keywords
- plasma catecholamines, norepinephrine, epinephrine, coronary sinus, aorta, femoral vein, handgrip exercise, cardiac sympathetic activity, sympathoadrenal system, cardiac function regulation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aorta, Coronary Vessels, Epinephrine, Physical Exertion, Female, Femoral Vein, Cardiac Catheterization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Norepinephrine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review