Cited by 24Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Plasma Catecholamine Levels in the Coronary Sinus, Aorta and Femoral Vein of Subjects Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization at Rest and During Exercise.

Open access

Abstract

Plasma catecholamine (CA) levels in the coronary sinus (CS), aorta (Ao) and femoral vein (fv) were simultaneously measured in 22 patients with various heart diseases at rest and during handgrip exercise (IHG). The mean resting levels of plasma norepinephine (NE) in CS, Ao and FV were 359 +/- 49 (SEM) pg/ml, 290 +/- 27 and 234 +/- 24, respectively. The corresponding values of epinephrine (E) were 127 +/- 18 pg/ml, 186+/- 30 and 97 +/- 11, respectively. The E values in Ao were significantly greater than those in CS and in FV (p less than 0.05). IHG exercise induced an obvious elevation of plasma CA levels in every portion of the circulation studied. The mean increments of NE concentration were 81%, 54% and 67% of the resting levels at CS, Ao and FV, respectively, while IHG induced elevation of E were 70% of the resting values at each portion studied. Significant correlations were observed between individual CA concentrations in CS and in Ao, and also between those in Ao and in FV at rest. Under raised sympathoadrenal conditions, however, individual values of NE in CS failed to correlate signficantly to those in Ao and in FV, respectively. The NE output from CS was limited to only 3% and 5% of those in Ao at rest and during IHG, respectively. An actual mean increment of NE on its passing through the coronary circulation was only 2% or less of NE output in ao at both stages. It appears, thus, to be untenable that the cardiac tissue is one of the major source of circulating CA at physiological condition. From these reasons, the direct measurement of NE levels in CS may be mandatory, when plasma CA assay is designed for the purpose of studying the role of the sympathetic nerve activity in the regulation of cardiac function.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1253/jcj.40.929

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
MIURA, Y., HANEDA, T., SATO, T., MIYAZAWA, K., SAKUMA, H., KOBAYASHI, K., MINAI, K., SHIRATO, K., HONNA, T., TAKISHIMA, T., & YOSHINAGA, K.
Venue
Japanese Circulation Journal
Published
1976
Volume
40
Issue
8
Pages
929-934
ISSN
  • 0047-1828 (ISSN-L)
  • 1347-4839
OpenAlex
W2025164069
Cited by
24
References
0
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Japanese Circulation Journal-english Edition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
plasma catecholamines, norepinephrine, epinephrine, coronary sinus, aorta, femoral vein, handgrip exercise, cardiac sympathetic activity, sympathoadrenal system, cardiac function regulation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aorta, Coronary Vessels, Epinephrine, Physical Exertion, Female, Femoral Vein, Cardiac Catheterization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Norepinephrine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review