Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 248

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Towards An Understanding of the Mechanism of Electron-Capture Dissociation: A Historical Perspective and Modern Ideas

Zubarev, Roman A., Haselmann, Kim F., Budnik, Bogdan, Kjeldsen, Frank, Jensen, Frank·2002·European Journal of Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

Electron-capture dissociation (ECD) is a new fragmentation technique that utilizes ion–electron recombination reactions. The latter have parallels in other research fields; revealing these parallels helps to understand the ECD mechanism. An overview is given of ECD-related phenomena and of the history of ECD discovery and development. Current views on the ECD mechanism are discussed using both published and new examples.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1255/ejms.517

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 248

Metadata

Authors
Zubarev, R. A., Haselmann, K. F., Budnik, B., Kjeldsen, F., & Jensen, F.
Venue
European Journal of Mass Spectrometry
Published
2002-10
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
337-349
ISSN
  • 1356-1049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0667
  • 1751-6838
OpenAlex
W2081620687
Cited by
248
References
0
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards An Understanding of the Mechanism of Electron-Capture Dissociation: A Historical Perspective and Modern Ideas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1255/ejms.517
The paper
Zubarev, R. A., Haselmann, K. F., Budnik, B., Kjeldsen, F., & Jensen, F. (2002). Towards An Understanding of the Mechanism of Electron-Capture Dissociation: A Historical Perspective and Modern Ideas. European Journal of Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1255/ejms.517

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.