Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dynamical aspects of the life cycle of the winter storm ‘Lothar’ (24–26 December 1999)

Wernli, Heini, Dirren, Sebastien, Liniger, Mark A., Zillig, Matthias·2002·Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Abstract

Dynamical aspects of the life cycle of the winter storm ‘Lothar’ (24–26 December 1999) are investigated with the aid of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts analysis data and mesoscale model simulations. Neither of these datasets capture the full amplitude of the observed extreme pressure fall and surface wind speeds, but they do help identify a range of key dynamical and physical features that characterize the development of this unusual event. The analysis and interpretation is primarily based upon the evolution of the lower‐ and upper‐level potential vorticity (PV) field complemented by three‐dimensional trajectory calculations. ‘Lothar’ originated in the western Atlantic and travelled as a shallow low‐level cyclone of moderate intensity towards Europe. This translation took place below and slightly to the south of a very intense upper‐level jet and was accompanied by continuous and intense condensational heating that sustained a pronounced positive low‐level PV anomaly (not unlike the concept of a ‘diabatic Rossby wave’). No significant PV anomalies were evident at the tropopause level during this early phase of the life cycle. The surface cyclone intensified rapidly when the shallow cyclone approached the jet‐stream axis. The circulation induced by the diabatically produced low‐tropospheric PV anomaly on steeply sloping isentropic surfaces that transect the intense upper‐level jet contributed significantly to the rapid formation of a narrow and deep tropopause fold. This stratospheric PV anomaly virtually merged with the diabatically produced ephemeral PV feature to form a vertically aligned tower of positive PV at the time of maximum storm intensity. A sensitivity study with a dry adiabatic hindcast simulation shows no PV‐tower configuration (and only a very weak surface development) and confirms the primary importance of the cloud diabatic heating for the tropopause fold formation and the rapid ‘bottom‐up’ intensification of ‘Lothar’. A comparison of the anomalously high Atlantic sea surface temperatures in December 1999 with the water‐vapour source regions for the latent‐heat release that accompanied the rapid intensification phase of ‘Lothar’ shows a close relationship. This is of importance when discussing the possible implications of climate variability and change on the development of North Atlantic winter storms. Copyright © 2002 Royal Meteorological Society

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1256/003590002321042036

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 270

Metadata

Authors
Wernli, H., Dirren, S., Liniger, M. A., & Zillig, M.
Venue
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-01
Volume
128
Issue
580
Pages
405-429
ISSN
  • 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-870X
OpenAlex
W2004586810
Cited by
270
References
0
FWCI
4.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamical aspects of the life cycle of the winter storm ‘Lothar’ (24–26 December 1999). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1256/003590002321042036
The paper
Wernli, H., Dirren, S., Liniger, M. A., & Zillig, M. (2002). Dynamical aspects of the life cycle of the winter storm ‘Lothar’ (24–26 December 1999). Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1256/003590002321042036

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.