Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 867

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cluster-Sample Methods in Applied Econometrics

Wooldridge, Jeffrey M·2003·American Economic Review

Abstract

Inference methods that recognize the clustering of individual observations have been available for more than 25 years. Brent Moulton (1990) caught the attention of economists when he demonstrated the serious biases that can result in estimating the effects of aggregate explanatory variables on individual-specific response variables. The source of the downward bias in the usual ordinary least-squares (OLS) standard errors is the presence of an unobserved, state-level effect in the error term. More recently, John Pepper (2002) showed how accounting for multi-level clustering can have dramatic effects on t statistics. While adjusting for clustering is much more common than it was 10 years ago, inference methods robust to cluster correlation are not used routinely across all relevant settings. In this paper, I provide an overview of applications of cluster-sample methods, both to cluster samples and to panel data sets.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/000282803321946930

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1987.mp49004006.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. Card David, 1994, American Economic Review, 84, 772
  3. 10.1093/biomet/73.1.13 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.2307/2109952 · DOI
  5. 10.2307/2109724 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00010-1 · DOI

Cited by

See all 867

Metadata

Authors
Wooldridge, J. M.
Affiliations
Department of Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1038.
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2003-04-01
Volume
93
Issue
2
Pages
133-138
ISSN
0002-8282
Cited by
867
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cluster-Sample Methods in Applied Econometrics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/000282803321946930
The paper
Wooldridge, J. M. (2003). Cluster-Sample Methods in Applied Econometrics. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321946930

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.