The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Libertarian Paternalism
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Status quo bias in decision making
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00055564 · Cited by 5,897
Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.193 · Cited by 5,019
Self-citationThe Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior
Madrian, B. C., & Shea, D. F. (2001) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355301753265543 · Cited by 3,119
How Much Is Investor Autonomy Worth?
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (2002) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00472 · Cited by 340
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,000
Does Libertarian Paternalism Reconcile Merit Goods Theory with Mainstream Economics?
Mann, S., & Gairing, M. (2010) · Forum for Social Economics · doi:10.1007/s12143-010-9084-3 · Cited by 27
Nudges, Regulations and Liberty
Dowding, K. M., & Oprea, A. (2022) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123421000685 · Cited by 31
Should Aspirations be a Matter of Policy Concern?
Flechtner, S. (2017) · Journal of Human Development and Capabilities · doi:10.1080/19452829.2017.1364224 · Cited by 30
Using Behavioral Economics and Technology to Improve Outcomes in Cardio-Oncology
Waddell, K. J., Shah, P. D., Adusumalli, S., & Patel, M. S. (2020) · JACC CardioOncology · doi:10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.02.006 · Cited by 27
Dworkin, G. (2015) · Library of ethics and applied philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17960-5_2 · Cited by 27
Bastini, K., Kerschreiter, R., Lachmann, M., Ziegler, M. D., & Sawert, T. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-023-05516-8 · Cited by 28
Willpower depletion and framing effects
de Haan, T., & van Veldhuizen, R. (2015) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.06.002 · Cited by 31
Decision sciences and the new case for paternalism: three welfare-related justificatory challenges
Fumagalli, R. (2016) · Social Choice and Welfare · doi:10.1007/s00355-016-0972-1 · Cited by 27
The excessive choice effect meets the market: A field experiment on craft beer choice
Malone, T., & Lusk, J. L. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2017.01.008 · Cited by 29
Old Wine in New Bottles? Parentalism, Power, and Its Legitimacy in Business–Society Relations
Etchanchu, H., & Djelic, M. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3928-9 · Cited by 27
Tsakalotos, E. (2005) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/bei075 · Cited by 27
Don't Take 'No' For An Answer: An Experiment With Actual Organ Donor Registrations
Kessler, J. B., & Roth, A. E. (2014) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w20378 · Cited by 27
Incorporating Employee Heterogeneity into Default Rules for Retirement Plan SelectionPreprint
Goda, G. S., & Manchester, C. F. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1611782 · Cited by 27
Markets and Manipulation: Time for a Paradigm Shift?
Basu, K. (2018) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20161410 · Cited by 27
Chokshi, S. K., Belli, H. M., Troxel, A. B., Blecker, S., Blaum, C. S., Testa, P. A., & Mann, D. (2019) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-019-0403-z · Cited by 26
Sustainability nudges in the context of customer co-design for consumer electronics
Hankammer, S., Kleer, R., & Piller, F. (2020) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-020-01020-x · Cited by 1
Local food sales and point of sale priming: evidence from a supermarket field experiment
Brečić, R., Ćorić, D. S., Lučić, A., Gorton, M., & Filipović, J. (2021) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-07-2019-0604 · Cited by 26
Cognitive biases in moral judgments that affect political behavior
Baron, J. (2009) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9478-z · Cited by 28
Bansback, N. J., LI, L. C., Lynd, L. D., & Bryan, S. (2014) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-14-62 · Cited by 27
Good Intentions, Optimistic Self-Predictions, and Missed Opportunities
Koehler, D. J., White, R. J., & John, L. (2011) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550610375722 · Cited by 33
Behaviorism and Control in the History of Economics and Psychology
Edwards, J. M. (2016) · History of Political Economy · doi:10.1215/00182702-3619262 · Cited by 26
Are “Voluntary” Self-Employed Better Prepared for Retirement Than “Forced” Self-Employed?
Hershey, D. A., van Dalen, H. P., Conen, W. S., & Henkens, K. (2017) · Work Aging and Retirement · doi:10.1093/workar/wax008 · Cited by 26
Behavioral Biases and Long-Term Care Insurance: A Political Economy Approach
Donder, P. D., & Leroux, M. (2013) · The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy · doi:10.1515/bejeap-2012-0074 · Cited by 26
Walsh, J., Vaida, N., Coman, A., & Fiske, S. T. (2022) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/15291006231161337 · Cited by 26
If Nudges Treat their Targets as Rational Agents, Nonconsensual Neurointerventions Can Too
Douglas, T. (2022) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-022-10285-w · Cited by 25
Davola, A., Querci, I., & Romani, S. (2022) · Journal of Consumer Policy · doi:10.1007/s10603-022-09530-7 · Cited by 29
The Dead Hand of the Past? Toward an Understanding of “Constitutional Veneration”
Zink, J. R., & Dawes, C. T. (2015) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-015-9325-5 · Cited by 28
Berg, J., Henriksson, M., & Ihlström, J. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11092521 · Cited by 25
On Nudging’s Supposed Threat to Rational Decision-Making
Houk, T. (2019) · The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.1093/jmp/jhz014 · Cited by 25
Belli, H. M., Chokshi, S. K., Hegde, R., Troxel, A. B., Blecker, S., Testa, P. A., Anderman, J., Wong, C., & Mann, D. M. (2020) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-020-06119-z · Cited by 27
Indrio, F., Dargenio, V. N., Marchese, F., Giardino, I., Vural, M., Carrasco-Sanz, A., Pietrobelli, A., & Pettoello‐Mantovani, M. (2022) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.03.001 · Cited by 29
Meramveliotakis, G., & Μanioudis, Μ. (2023) · Journal of the Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1007/s13132-023-01458-8 · Cited by 25
The Choice Channel of Financial Innovation
Iachan, F. S., Nenov, P. T., & Simsek, A. (2021) · American Economic Journal Macroeconomics · doi:10.1257/mac.20180429 · Cited by 25
Are default contributions sticky? An experimental analysis of defaults in public goods provision
Cappelletti, D., Mittone, L., & Ploner, M. (2014) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2014.01.002 · Cited by 25
Is rational choice theory still a rational choice of theory? A response to Opp
Manzo, G. (2013) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/0539018413488477 · Cited by 30
Richard H. Thaler: A Nobel Prize for Behavioural Economics
Earl, P. E. (2018) · Review of Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09538259.2018.1513236 · Cited by 34
Superannuation in Australia: A Survey of the Literature
Kingston, G. H., & Thorp, S. (2018) · Economic Record · doi:10.1111/1475-4932.12443 · Cited by 25
Credible Commitment or Paternalism? The Case of Unamendability
Michel, S., & Cofone, I. (2018) · Ius gentium · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95141-6_5 · Cited by 24
Green Capitalism, Sustainability, and Everyday Practice
Gäbler, K. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16477-9_4 · Cited by 25
Theorizing the behavioral state: Resolving the theory-practice paradox of policy sciences
Leong, C., & Howlett, M. P. (2020) · Public Policy and Administration · doi:10.1177/0952076720977588 · Cited by 24
Sætra, H. S. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00092-x · Cited by 27
The Normative Problem of Merit Goods in Perspective
Desmarais-Tremblay, M. (2016) · Forum for Social Economics · doi:10.1080/07360932.2016.1196593 · Cited by 30
James M. Buchanan: Through an Austrian window
Rizzo, M. J. (2014) · The Review of Austrian Economics · doi:10.1007/s11138-014-0260-1 · Cited by 23
Maier, M., Powell, D., Murchie, P., & Allan, J. (2025) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2025.2513916 · Cited by 26
Nudging is Ineffective When Attitudes Are Unsupportive: An Example from a Natural Field Experiment
Dewies, M., Schop-Etman, A., Rohde, K. I. M., & Denktaş, S. (2021) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2021.1917412 · Cited by 24
Espinosa, V. I., Wang, W. H., & de Soto, J. H. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14042145 · Cited by 30
Schnellenbach, J. (2011) · Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2516.2012.00381.x · Cited by 23
Mitigating Choice Overload: An Experiment in the U.S. Beer Market
Malone, T., & Lusk, J. L. (2018) · Journal of Wine Economics · doi:10.1017/jwe.2018.34 · Cited by 23
Behavioral criminology and public policy
Loughran, T. A. (2019) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12465 · Cited by 28
Vlaev, I., Chater, N., & Stewart, N. (2007) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500000619 · Cited by 24
Revealing the Discourses: White Entrepreneurial Motivation in Black South Africa
Boluk, K. A. (2011) · Tourism Planning & Development · doi:10.1080/21568316.2011.573922 · Cited by 23
Product innovation and consumer choice in the UK financial services industry
Costanzo, L. A., & Ashton, J. K. (2006) · Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance · doi:10.1108/13581980610685658 · Cited by 23
Incorporating Employee Heterogeneity into Default Rules for Retirement Plan Selection
Goda, G. S., & Manchester, C. F. (2013) · The Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.1353/jhr.2013.0000 · Cited by 23
Student Loan Nudges: Experimental Evidence on Borrowing and Educational Attainment
Marx, B., & Turner, L. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w24060 · Cited by 24
Not just User Control in the General Data Protection Regulation
Quelle, C. (2016) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55783-0_11 · Cited by 22
Fenton, A. (2019) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/0022146519849895 · Cited by 22
The Limits to Libertarian Paternalism: Two New Critiques and Seven Best-Practice Imperatives
Gill, N., & Gill, M. (2012) · Environment and Planning C Government and Policy · doi:10.1068/c11149r · Cited by 21
Behavioural interventions for micro-mobility adoption: Low-hanging fruits or hard nuts to crack?
Bao, H. X. H., & Lim, Y. H. (2022) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2021.12.011 · Cited by 22
Default rules in investment decision-making: trait anxiety and decision-making styles
Gambetti, E., Zucchelli, M. M., Nori, R., & Giusberti, F. (2022) · Financial Innovation · doi:10.1186/s40854-021-00329-y · Cited by 24
Reinventing Marketing and Public Policy for the Twenty-First Century: An Editorial Statement
Stewart, D. W. (2013) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1509/jppm.32.1.1 · Cited by 22
Does personalized information improve health plan choices when individuals are distracted?
Kaufmann, C., Müller, T., Hefti, A., & Boes, S. (2018) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2018.03.013 · Cited by 24
Mehta, J. (2013) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/bet040 · Cited by 22
Tratalos, J. A., Sugden, R., Bateman, I. J., Gill, J. A., Jones, A. P., Showler, D. A., Sutherland, W. J., & Watkinson, A. R. (2013) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-013-9634-2 · Cited by 22
Resources, Capabilities, and Routines in Public OrganizationsPreprint
Klein, P. G., Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1550028 · Cited by 22
Commitment devices: beyond the medical ethics of nudges
Hodson, N. (2022) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2021-107967 · Cited by 21
Why Inequalities Persist in Public Deliberation: Five Mechanisms of Marginalization
Holdo, M., & Sagrelius, L. Ö. (2019) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0032321719868707 · Cited by 21
Tutorial. A Behavioral Analysis of Rationality, Nudging, and Boosting: Implications for Policymaking
Tagliabue, M. (2022) · Perspectives on Behavior Science · doi:10.1007/s40614-021-00324-9 · Cited by 28
Seeing the nudge from the trees: The 4S framework for evaluating nudges
Mills, S., & Whittle, R. (2023) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12941 · Cited by 21
Health systems futures: The challenges of technology, prevention and insurance
Costa‐Font, J., & Sato, A. (2012) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2012.04.009 · Cited by 21
Behavioral economics has two ‘souls’: Do they both depart from economic rationality?
Zarri, L. (2009) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2009.06.008 · Cited by 21
Lecouteux, G. (2015) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-015-0265-0 · Cited by 22
Tomiura, E., Ito, B., Mukunoki, H., & Wakasugi, R. (2016) · Review of International Economics · doi:10.1111/roie.12248 · Cited by 23
Labelling Genetically Modified Food: The Right to Know
Sand, P. H. (2006) · Review of European Community & International Environmental Law · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9388.2006.00520.x · Cited by 21
Insurance Take-Up in Rural China: Learning from Hypothetical ExperiencePreprint
Cai, J., & Song, C. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2161649 · Cited by 21
Preference for SimplicityPreprint
Puri, I. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3253494 · Cited by 20
Valuing Morbidity in Environmental Benefit-Cost Analysis
Cameron, T. A. (2014) · Annual Review of Resource Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-091912-151943 · Cited by 20
Understanding how gamification influences consumers’ dietary preferences
Aydın, S. Ö., & Argan, M. (2021) · Journal of Social Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsocm-09-2019-0137 · Cited by 24
On the possibility of an anti-paternalist behavioural welfare economics
Thoma, J. (2021) · Journal of Economic Methodology · doi:10.1080/1350178x.2021.1972128 · Cited by 20
The Whole PERSON Health Score: A Patient-Focused Tool to Measure Nonmedical Determinants of Health
Khurana, D., Leung, G., Sasaninia, B., Tran, D., Khan, M., & Firek, A. F. (2022) · NEJM Catalyst · doi:10.1056/cat.22.0096 · Cited by 20
Deployment of Source Address Validation by Network Operators: A Randomized Control Trial
Lone, Q., Frik, A., Luckie, M. J., Korczyński, M., van Eeten, M. J. G., & Gañán, C. (2022) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp46214.2022.9833701 · Cited by 20
AI, Behavioural Science, and Consumer Welfare
Mills, S., Costa, S., & Sunstein, C. R. (2023) · Journal of Consumer Policy · doi:10.1007/s10603-023-09547-6 · Cited by 35
Self-citationLibertarian paternalism and health care policy: a deliberative proposal
Schiavone, G., Anna, G. D., Mameli, M., Rebba, V. S., & Boniolo, G. (2013) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-013-9502-4 · Cited by 20
Nudging the obese: a UK–US consideration
Oliver, A., & Ubel, P. A. (2014) · Health Economics Policy and Law · doi:10.1017/s1744133114000103 · Cited by 20
Kristjanpoller, W., & Olson, J. E. (2014) · Journal of Pensions Economics and Finance · doi:10.1017/s1474747214000213 · Cited by 21
The challenges and opportunities of ‘nudging’
Codagnone, C., Veltri, G., Lupiáñez‐Villanueva, F., & Bogliacino, F. (2014) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2014-203948 · Cited by 22
Shale Gas The Promise and the Peril
Rao, V. (2012) · doi:10.3768/rtipress.2012.bk.0009.1206 · Cited by 20
The behavioral welfare economics of insurance
Harrison, G. W. (2019) · The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review · doi:10.1057/s10713-019-00042-y · Cited by 20
Nudging and the choice architecture of offending decisions
Pogarsky, G., & Herman, S. (2019) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12470 · Cited by 23
Liebig, G., & Rommel, J. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Policy · doi:10.1007/s10603-014-9264-2 · Cited by 20
Coffino, J. A., & Hormes, J. M. (2018) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.22151 · Cited by 20
Planning for natural disasters in a stochastic world
Lave, L. B., & Apt, J. (2006) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-006-0174-9 · Cited by 20
Cognitive Biases, Cognitive Limits, and Risk Communication
Baron, J. (2004) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1509/jppm.23.1.7.30397 · Cited by 21
Increasing altruistic and cooperative behaviour with simple moral nudgesPreprint
Capraro, V., Jagfeld, G., Klein, R., Mul, M., & van de Pol, I. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/tbhqa · Cited by 22
Understanding the user perception of digital nudging in platform interface design
Hettler, F. M., Schumacher, J.-P., Anton, E., Eybey, B., & Teuteberg, F. (2024) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-024-09825-6 · Cited by 19
Chimonas, S. C., Fortier, E., Li, D. G., & Lipitz‐Snyderman, A. (2019) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x19855050 · Cited by 19
Innovation nudging—A novel approach to foster innovation engagement in an incumbent company
Stieler, M., & Henike, T. (2021) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12475 · Cited by 19
Behavioural insights for sustainable energy use
Luis Mundaca, T., Zhu, X., & Hackenfort, M. (2022) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113292 · Cited by 21
Horn, A., Kevins, A., & van Kersbergen, K. (2022) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwac060 · Cited by 19
Consumer support of policy measures to increase sustainability in food consumption
Ammann, J., Arbenz, A., Mack, G., & Siegrist, M. (2025) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102822 · Cited by 19
Operationalizing the capability approach to assessing well-being
Agee, M. D., & Crocker, T. D. (2013) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2013.07.003 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2003-04-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-179
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4245007606
- Cited by
- 1,874
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 80 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 144 · 2022: 146 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 176 · 2018: 134 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 86 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 61
- FWCI
- 69.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Legal and Constitutional Studies
- Keywords
- libertarian paternalism, nudging, behavioral economics, choice architecture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review