Cited by 703Poverty, Education, and Child WelfareChild Nutrition and Water AccessGlobal Maternal and Child Health

Do Conditional Cash Transfers Improve Child Health? Evidence from PROGRESA′s Control Randomized Experiment

Gertler, Paul·2004·American Economic Review

Abstract

Do Conditional Cash Transfers Improve Child Health? Evidence from PROGRESA's Control Randomized Experiment by Paul Gertler. Published in volume 94, issue 2, pages 336-341 of American Economic Review, May 2004

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/0002828041302109

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Randomized trials of conditional cash transfers, including the original Progresa launch, showed substantial improvements on conditioned indicators initially and over the medium term.

    “A number of randomized trials of these programs, including the original launch of Progresa, showed that these programs led to substantial improvements on the conditioned indicators, both initially (for example, see Behrman and Todd 1999;Gertler 2004) and over the medium term (Behrman, Parker, and Todd 2011; Barham, Macours, and Maluccio 2017; Kugler and Rojas 2018; Cahyadi, Hanna, Olken, Prima, S”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gertler, P.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Gertler, Paul
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2004-04-01
Volume
94
Issue
2
Pages
336-341
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084509705
Cited by
703
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 30
FWCI
42.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
conditional cash transfers, child health, PROGRESA, school attendance, child nutrition, poverty reduction
MeSH terms
Child Health, Anemia, Body Height, Child Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Child, Preschool, Female, Financing, Government, Health Promotion, Humans, Hygiene, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Mexico, Morbidity, Poverty, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review