Cited by 238Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesGame Theory and ApplicationsGame Theory and Voting Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Managing Growth to Achieve Efficient Coordination in Large Groups

Open access
Weber, Roberto A·2006·American Economic Review

Abstract

Previous experiments using the minimum-effort coordination game reveal a striking regularity—large groups never coordinate efficiently. Given the frequency with which large real-world groups, such as firms, face similarly difficult coordination problems, this poses an important question: Why do we observe large, successfully coordinated groups in the real world when they are so difficult to create in the laboratory? This paper presents one reason. The experiments show that, even though efficient coordination does not occur in groups that start off large, efficiently coordinated large groups can be “grown.” By starting with small groups that find it easier to coordinate, we can add entrants—who are aware of the group's history—to create efficiently coordinated large groups. This represents the first experimental demonstration of large groups tacitly coordinated at high levels of efficiency.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/000282806776157588

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00086-9 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0899-8256(02)00012-X · DOI
  3. Brandts Jordi, American Economic Review (forthcoming).
  4. 10.2307/2946661 · DOI
  5. 10.1006/obhd.2000.2882 · DOI
  6. 10.1006/game.1999.0776 · DOI
  7. Coase Ronald H, 1937, Econometrica, 4, 386
  8. 10.2307/2951699 · DOI
  9. 10.1287/orsc.12.4.468.10636 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/BF00141070 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/smj.4250150908 · DOI
  12. Nanda Ashish, 1999, ISPA, 489
  13. Tichy Noel, 2001, Harvard Business Review, 79, 63
  14. Van Huyck John B, 1990, American Economic Review, 80, 234
  15. 10.1287/orsc.12.5.582.10090 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 238

Metadata

Authors
Weber, R. A.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Weber, Roberto A
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2006-02-01
Volume
96
Issue
1
Pages
114-126
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121150962
Cited by
238
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 15
FWCI
34.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
Keywords
group size, group growth, new entrants, tacit coordination, coordination efficiency, large groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Managing Growth to Achieve Efficient Coordination in Large Groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/000282806776157588
The paper
Weber, R. A. (2006). Managing Growth to Achieve Efficient Coordination in Large Groups. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157588