The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Managing Growth to Achieve Efficient Coordination in Large Groups
Open accessAbstract
Previous experiments using the minimum-effort coordination game reveal a striking regularity—large groups never coordinate efficiently. Given the frequency with which large real-world groups, such as firms, face similarly difficult coordination problems, this poses an important question: Why do we observe large, successfully coordinated groups in the real world when they are so difficult to create in the laboratory? This paper presents one reason. The experiments show that, even though efficient coordination does not occur in groups that start off large, efficiently coordinated large groups can be “grown.” By starting with small groups that find it easier to coordinate, we can add entrants—who are aware of the group's history—to create efficiently coordinated large groups. This represents the first experimental demonstration of large groups tacitly coordinated at high levels of efficiency.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Increased participation by developers in code discussion can introduce more perspectives, thereby extending the time required to reach consensus (Weber 2006, Feri et al. 2010, Yu et al. 2015, Roels and Corbett 2024).”
From The Impact of Generative AI on Collaborative Open-Source Software Development: Evidence from GitHub Copilot (2024) · cites this paper as Weber 2006
Citations
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- 10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00086-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0899-8256(02)00012-X · DOI
- Brandts Jordi, American Economic Review (forthcoming).
- 10.2307/2946661 · DOI
- 10.1006/obhd.2000.2882 · DOI
- 10.1006/game.1999.0776 · DOI
- Coase Ronald H, 1937, Econometrica, 4, 386
- 10.2307/2951699 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.12.4.468.10636 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00141070 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250150908 · DOI
- Nanda Ashish, 1999, ISPA, 489
- Tichy Noel, 2001, Harvard Business Review, 79, 63
- Van Huyck John B, 1990, American Economic Review, 80, 234
- 10.1287/orsc.12.5.582.10090 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Song, F., Agarwal, A., & Wen, W. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal (preprint) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4856935 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Weber, R. A.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Weber, Roberto A
- ORCID
- Weber, Roberto A
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2006-02-01
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 114-126
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3121150962
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 34.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Keywords
- group size, group growth, new entrants, tacit coordination, coordination efficiency, large groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Managing Growth to Achieve Efficient Coordination in Large Groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/000282806776157588
- The paper
- Weber, R. A. (2006). Managing Growth to Achieve Efficient Coordination in Large Groups. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157588