The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating Welfare Reform in the United States
Abstract
This paper reviews the economic literature on welfare reform over the 1990s. A brief summary of the policy changes is followed by a discussion of the methodological techniques that analyze the effects of these changes on outcomes. The paper then critically reviews the econometric and experimental literature on caseload changes, labor force changes, poverty and income changes, and family formation changes. A growing body of evidence suggests that recent policy changes have influenced economic behavior and well-being. One particular set of "new-style" welfare programs seems to show especially promising results, with significantly increased work and earnings and reduced poverty.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Myth and Measurement: The New Economics of the Minimum Wage.
Cohn, S., Card, D., & Kreuger, A. B. (1996) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2077128 · Cited by 1,305
Making ends meet: how single mothers survive welfare and low-wage work
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1224 · Cited by 1,229
Incentive Effects of the U.S. Welfare System: A Review
Moffitt, R. (1992) · Cited by 1,110
Measuring Poverty: A New Approach
Citro, C. F., Michael, R. T., Poverty, P. O., & Assistance, F. (1995) · Cited by 1,077
Welfare, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and the Labor Supply of Single Mothers
Meyer, B. D., & Rosenbaum, D. T. (2001) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/00335530152466313 · Cited by 815
Labor Supply Response to the Earned Income Tax Credit
Eissa, N., & Liebman, J. B. (1996) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2946689 · Cited by 749
Labor Supply Response to the Earned Income Tax Credit
Eissa, N., & Liebman, J. (1995) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w5158 · Cited by 717
Welfare, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and the Labor Supply of Single Mothers
Meyer, B., & Rosenbaum, D. (1999) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w7363 · Cited by 699
Targeting Transfers through Restrictions on Recipients
Nichols, A. L., & Zeckhauser, R. (1982) · American Economic Review · Cited by 461
Ellwood, D. T. (2000) · National Tax Journal · doi:10.17310/ntj.2000.4s1.03 · Cited by 440
Cited by
Inside the War on Poverty: The Impact of Food Stamps on Birth Outcomes
Almond, D., Hoynes, H. W., & Schanzenbach, D. W. (2011) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00089 · Cited by 547
What Mean Impacts Miss: Distributional Effects of Welfare Reform Experiments
Bitler, M. P., Gelbach, J. B., & Hoynes, H. W. (2006) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.96.4.988 · Cited by 426
Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Theory and Practice
Angrist, J. D. (2004) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.0013-0133.2003.00195.x · Cited by 363
The Price we pay: economic and social consequences of inadequate education
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-6317 · Cited by 354
Cash, food, or vouchers? Evidence from a randomized experiment in northern Ecuador
Hidrobo, M., Hoddinott, J., Peterman, A., Margolies, A., & Moreira, V. (2014) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.11.009 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Blank, R. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Literature
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1105-1166
- ISSN
- 0022-0515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3124469745
- Cited by
- 664
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 102.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating Welfare Reform in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/002205102762203576
- The paper
- Blank, R. M. (2002). Evaluating Welfare Reform in the United States. Journal of Economic Literature. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205102762203576
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.