The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government: Lessons from Past Productivity Booms
Open accessAbstract
A number of observers argue that the present era of robust trend productivity growth will soon come to an end. Others contend that the potential gains to productivity from the technological advances associated with the computer revolution are far from complete. In assessing the likelihood of these alternative outcomes, one should recognize that periods of strong trend productivity growth, although perhaps novel to many of us, are not new to the U.S. economy. In particular, three earlier periods of strong trend productivity growth stand out from the historical record as especially worthy of further scrutiny for the lessons they may offer regarding the current episode: the late 1800s from roughly the end of the Civil War to around 1890; the decade or so between the end of World War I and the onset of the Great Depression; and the period from about 1950 to the early 1970s.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These authors give an overall estimate of labor productivity growth between 1927 and 1948 as 1.8 percent per year.”
From Modeling Social Pressures Toward Political Instability (2013) · cites this paper as Ferguson and Wascher 2004
Citations
Cites
Does the “New Economy” Measure up to the Great Inventions of the Past?
Gordon, R. J. (2000) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.14.4.49 · Cited by 1,206
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- 10.1017/S002205070004626X · DOI
- 10.1257/0895330027184 · DOI
- Baker Dean, 2002, Challenge., 117
- 10.1086/261593 · DOI
- 10.1257/089533002320951000 · DOI
- 10.2307/2077848 · DOI
- 10.1086/261761 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0304-3932(97)00063-9 · DOI
- 10.1257/jep.14.4.23 · DOI · Paper page
- Cortada James W, 1993, NCR, Burroughs, & Remington Rand & the Industry They Created, 1865
- 10.2307/2594124 · DOI
- David Paul A, 1990, American Economic Review, 80, 355
- 10.1257/000282803769206377 · DOI
- 10.1016/0304-3932(93)90027-D · DOI
- 10.1017/S0022050700096285 · DOI
- Freeman Richard B, 2002, Autumn, 18, 288
- 10.1257/0895330027292 · DOI
- 10.2307/2235158 · DOI
- 10.1162/003355398555720 · DOI
- 10.1257/jep.2.4.9 · DOI
- Griliches Zvi, 1990, Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661
- 10.2307/3112231 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0022050700034483 · DOI
- Jorgenson Dale W, 2002, Third Quarter, 87, 1
- 10.1257/jep.13.1.63 · DOI
- 10.1016/0047-2727(88)90023-0 · DOI
- Madrick Jeffrey, 2002, New York Times, 24, C2
- Mansfield Edwin, 1965, Transportation Economics. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 169
- 10.2307/2534658 · DOI
- Oliner Stephen D, 2002, Third Quarter, 87, 15
- 10.1111/1467-9442.00243 · DOI
- 10.1086/261592 · DOI
- 10.1257/jep.12.3.89 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modeling Social Pressures Toward Political Instability
Turchin, P. (2013) · Cliodynamics: The Journal of Quantitative History and Cultural Evolution · doi:10.21237/c7clio4221333 · Cited by 42
“For the period before 1947, I consulted Ferguson and Wascher (2004: Table 1).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferguson, R. W., & Wascher, W. L.
- Affiliations
- Federal Reserve Board of Governors (US)
- ORCID
- Wascher, William L
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2004-05-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 3-28
- ISSN
- 0895-3309 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122942484
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 6.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journal of Economic Perspectives (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Education
- University of Cambridge
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Development and Digital Transformation
- Keywords
- productivity slowdown, digital revolution, technological change, economic growth, state economic policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review