The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Media, Education and Anti-Americanism in the Muslim World
Abstract
Recent surveys in the United States and the Muslim world show widespread misinformation about the events of September 11, 2001. Using data from 9 predominantly Muslim countries, we study how such beliefs depend on exposure to news media and levels of education. Standard economic theory would predict that increased access to information should cause beliefs to converge. More recent models of biased belief formation suggest that this result might hinge critically on who is providing the information. Consistent with the latter, we find that overall intensity of media use and level of education have at best a weak correlation with beliefs, while particular information sources have strong and divergent effects. Compared to those with little media exposure or schooling, individuals watching Arab news channels or educated in schools with little Western influence are less likely to agree that the September 11 attacks were carried out by Arab terrorists. Those exposed to media or education from Western sources are more likely to agree. Belief that the attacks were morally justified and general attitudes toward the US are also strongly correlated with source of information. These findings survive controls for demographic characteristics and are robust to identifying media effects using cross-country variation in language.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 · Cited by 4,583
Education, Poverty and Terrorism: Is There a Causal Connection?
Krueger, A. B., & Malečková, J. (2003) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533003772034925 · Cited by 1,362
Cited by
The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting
DellaVigna, S., & Kaplan, E. (2007) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.122.3.1187 · Cited by 1,602
Education, Poverty and Terrorism: Is There a Causal Connection?
Krueger, A. B., & Malečková, J. (2003) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533003772034925 · Cited by 1,362
The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics
Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12394 · Cited by 1,183
The Causal Impact of Media in Financial Markets
ENGELBERG, J. E., & PARSONS, C. A. (2011) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01626.x · Cited by 1,121
The Power of TV: Cable Television and Women's Status in India *
Jensen, R., & Oster, E. (2009) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.3.1057 · Cited by 792
Metadata
- Authors
- Gentzkow, M. A., & Shapiro, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2004-08-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 117-133
- ISSN
- 0895-3309 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3021924681
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Media, Education and Anti-Americanism in the Muslim World. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/0895330042162313
- The paper
- Gentzkow, M. A., & Shapiro, J. M. (2004). Media, Education and Anti-Americanism in the Muslim World. Journal of Economic Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330042162313
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.