Cited by 1,170Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesAgricultural Innovations and Practices

Nudging Farmers to Use Fertilizer: Theory and Experimental Evidence from Kenya

Duflo, Esther, Kremer, Michael, Robinson, Jonathan·2011·American Economic Review

Abstract

We model farmers as facing small fixed costs of purchasing fertilizer and assume some are stochastically present biased and not fully sophisticated about this bias. Such farmers may procrastinate, postponing fertilizer purchases until later periods, when they may be too impatient to purchase fertilizer. Consistent with the model, many farmers in Western Kenya fail to take advantage of apparently profitable fertilizer investments, but they do invest in response to small, time-limited discounts on the cost of acquiring fertilizer (free delivery) just after harvest. Calibration suggests that this policy can yield higher welfare than either laissez-faire policies or heavy subsidies. (JEL Q13, Q12, Q16, Q18)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aer.101.6.2350

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duflo, E., Kremer, M., & Robinson, J.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • Brookings Institution (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2011-10-01
Volume
101
Issue
6
Pages
2350-2390
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3122219528
Cited by
1,170
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 94 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 26
FWCI
32.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Keywords
fertilizer use, nudging, present bias, procrastination, fertilizer subsidies, smallholder farmers, agricultural investment, welfare effects, Western Kenya

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review