Cited by 1,028Economic Growth and ProductivityGlobal trade and economicsInternational Business and FDI

Americans Do IT Better: US Multinationals and the Productivity Miracle

Bloom, Nicholas, Sadun, Raffaella, Reenen, John Van·2012·American Economic Review

Abstract

US productivity growth accelerated after 1995 (unlike Europe's), particularly in sectors that intensively use information technologies (IT). Using two new micro panel datasets we show that US multinationals operating in Europe also experienced a “productivity miracle.” US multinationals obtained higher productivity from IT than non-US multinationals, particularly in the same sectors responsible for the US productivity acceleration. Furthermore, establishments taken over by US multinationals (but not by non-US multinationals) increased the productivity of their IT. Combining pan-European firm-level IT data with our management practices survey, we find that the US IT related productivity advantage is primarily due to its tougher “people management” practices. (JEL D24, E23, F23, M10, M16, O30)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aer.102.1.167

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The stable groups assumption is presumably satisfied for the Bloom et al. (2012) regression because between each pair of consecutive years it is likely that some firms have no change in the amount of IT capital per employee.

    “The stable groups assumption is presumably satisfied: between each pair of consecutive years, it is likely that there are some firms where the amount of IT capital per employee ln( C/L ) does not change.”

    From Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (2020) · cites this paper as Bloom et al. (2012)

  • The Bloom et al. (2012) regression is a sharp design.

    “This is a sharp design.”

    From Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (2020) · cites this paper as Bloom et al. (2012)

  • The Bloom et al. (2012) regression in Column 6 of Table 2 is similar to Regression 1 with some controls, except that it has three treatment variables.

    “This regression is similar to Regression 1 with some controls, except that it has three treatment variables.”

    From Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (2020) · cites this paper as Bloom et al. (2012)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bloom, N., Sadun, R., & Reenen, J. V.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • London School of Economics, Centre for Economic Performance, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK, CEPR, and NBER.
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2012-02-01
Volume
102
Issue
1
Pages
167-201
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150611598
Cited by
1,028
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 104 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 30
FWCI
122.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/H02123X/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
Keywords
productivity growth, US multinationals, information technology, multinational acquisitions, cross-border mergers, management practices, personnel management, firm productivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review