Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160International Development and AidPolitical Conflict and GovernancePolitical Influence and Corporate Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Political Aid Cycles

Faye, Michael, Niehaus, Paul·2012·American Economic Review

Abstract

Researchers have scrutinized foreign aid's effects on poverty and growth, but anecdotal evidence suggests that donors often use aid for other ends. We test whether donors use bilateral aid to influence elections in developing countries. We find that recipient country administrations closely aligned with a donor receive more aid during election years, while those less aligned receive less. Consistent with our interpretation, this effect holds only in competitive elections, is absent in US aid flows to non-government entities, and is driven by bilateral alignment rather than incumbent characteristics.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aer.102.7.3516

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1023/A:1009874203400 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.04.003 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/wber/15.1.165 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0014-2921(95)00127-1 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.04.004 · DOI
  6. 10.1257/aer.98.5.2203 · DOI
  7. 10.1257/aer.90.4.847 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02482.x · DOI
  9. 10.1086/508311 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s11127-008-9286-x · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.02.003 · DOI
  12. 10.1257/0002828041464560 · DOI
  13. Faye Michael, 2012, American Economic Review. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer., 102, 3516, 10.1257/aer.102.7.3516 · DOI
  14. 10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.112801.080924 · DOI
  15. Greenberger Robert, 1989, Wall Street Journal
  16. 10.1016/1049-0078(90)90011-O · DOI
  17. 10.1162/003355305774268165 · DOI
  18. 10.1086/507155 · DOI
  19. 10.1086/262064 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00018-9 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/rfs/hhn053 · DOI
  22. 10.1257/aer.97.2.322 · DOI
  23. 10.1162/rest.90.4.643 · DOI
  24. Rogoff Kenneth, 1990, American Economic Review, 80, 21
  25. 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1996.tb01390.x · DOI
  26. Schuknecht Ludger, 2000, Public Choice, 102, 115
  27. Shi Min, 2003, Nordic Journal of Political Economy, 29, 67
  28. 10.1257/mac.1.2.225 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Faye, M., & Niehaus, P.
Affiliations
  • 128 East 62nd Street, New York, NY.
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2012-12-01
Volume
102
Issue
7
Pages
3516-3530
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040194440
Cited by
160
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
69.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Development › International Development and Aid
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Keywords
foreign aid, election year, bilateral aid, electoral competition, political economy of aid, developing countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.