The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The New Tools of Monetary Policy
Open accessAbstract
To overcome the limits on traditional monetary policy imposed by the effective lower bound on short-term interest rates, in recent years the Federal Reserve and other advanced-economy central banks have deployed new policy tools. This lecture reviews what we know about the new monetary tools, focusing on quantitative easing (QE) and forward guidance, the principal new tools used by the Fed. I argue that the new tools have proven effective at easing financial conditions when policy rates are constrained by the lower bound, even when financial markets are functioning normally, and that they can be made even more effective in the future. Accordingly, the new tools should become part of the standard central bank toolkit. Simulations of the Fed’s FRB/US model suggest that, if the nominal neutral interest rate is in the range of 2–3 percent, consistent with most estimates for the United States, then a combination of QE and forward guidance can provide the equivalent of roughly 3 percentage points of policy space, largely offsetting the effects of the lower bound. If the neutral rate is much lower, however, then overcoming the effects of the lower bound may require additional measures, such as a moderate increase in the inflation target or greater reliance on fiscal policy for economic stabilization. (JEL D78, E31, E43, E52, E58, E62)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Discretion versus policy rules in practice
Taylor, J. B. (1993) · Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy · doi:10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-l · Cited by 9,065
Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans
Kydland, F. E., & Prescott, E. C. (1977) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260580 · Cited by 7,905
Monetary policy surprises and interest rates: Evidence from the Fed funds futures market
Kuttner, K. N. (2001) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-3932(01)00055-1 · Cited by 2,049
Measuring the macroeconomic impact of monetary policy at the zero lower bound
WU, J. C., & XIA, F. D. (2016) · Journal of Money, Credit and Banking · doi:10.1111/jmcb.12300 · Cited by 1,842
Capital regulation, risk-taking and monetary policy: A missing link in the transmission mechanism?
Borio, C., & Zhu, H. (2012) · Journal of Financial Stability · doi:10.1016/j.jfs.2011.12.003 · Cited by 1,796
Zero Bound on Interest Rates and Optimal Monetary Policy
Eggertsson, G. B., & Woodford, M. (2003) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.1353/eca.2003.0010 · Cited by 1,789
International Journal of Central Banking
Angelini, P., & Giovane, P. D. (2012) · Cited by 1,257
Inflation Targeting: A New Framework for Monetary Policy?
Bernanke, B. S., & Mishkin, F. S. (1997) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.11.2.97 · Cited by 1,225
Self-citationThe Effects of Quantitative Easing on Interest Rates: Channels and Implications for Policy
Krishnamurthy, A., & Vissing-Jorgensen, A. (2011) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.1353/eca.2011.0019 · Cited by 1,188
Measuring the Natural Rate of Interest
Laubach, T., & Williams, J. C. (2003) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465303772815934 · Cited by 1,058
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernanke, B. S.
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2020-04-01
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 943-983
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3015184758
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 100.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The New Tools of Monetary Policy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/aer.110.4.943
- The paper
- Bernanke, B. S. (2020). The New Tools of Monetary Policy. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.110.4.943
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.