The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deposit Competition and Financial Fragility: Evidence from the US Banking Sector
Open accessAbstract
We develop a structural empirical model of the US banking sector. Insured depositors and run-prone uninsured depositors choose between differentiated banks. Banks compete for deposits and endogenously default. The estimated demand for uninsured deposits declines with banks' financial distress, which is not the case for insured deposits. We calibrate the supply side of the model. The calibrated model possesses multiple equilibria with bank-run features, suggesting that banks can be very fragile. We use our model to analyze proposed bank regulations. For example, our results suggest that a capital requirement below 18 percent can lead to significant instability in the banking system. (JEL E44, G01, G21, G28, G32)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2019) · AEA Papers and Proceedings · doi:10.1257/pandp.109.612 · Cited by 10,902
Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity
Diamond, D. W., & Dybvig, P. H. (1983) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261155 · Cited by 9,369
Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression
Stock, J. H., & Yogo, M. (2005) · Identification and Inference for Econometric Models · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511614491.006 · Cited by 7,211
“Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives”
(2016) · AMBER – ABBS Management Business and Entrepreneurship Review · doi:10.23874/amber/2016/v7/i1/121351 · Cited by 5,007
Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium
Berry, S., Levinsohn, J., & Pakes, A. (1995) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2171802 · Cited by 4,883
Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior
Gilboa, I., & Schmeidler, D. (1989) · Journal of Mathematical Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-4068(89)90018-9 · Cited by 4,040
Estimating Discrete-Choice Models of Product Differentiation
Berry, S. T. (1994) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2555829 · Cited by 2,939
Corporate Debt Value, Bond Covenants, and Optimal Capital Structure
LELAND, H. E. (1994) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb02452.x · Cited by 2,729
Liberalization, Moral Hazard in Banking, and Prudential Regulation: Are Capital Requirements Enough?
Hellmann, T. F., Murdock, K. C., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.1.147 · Cited by 2,088
The Theory of Bank Risk Taking and Competition Revisited
BOYD, J. H., & DE NICOLÓ, G. (2005) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00763.x · Cited by 2,084
Cited by
Banking on Deposits: Maturity Transformation without Interest Rate Risk
DRECHSLER, I., SAVOV, A., & SCHNABL, P. (2021) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.13013 · Cited by 394
Ultimate Ownership and Bank Competition
Azar, J., Raina, S., & Schmalz, M. C. (2016) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2710252 · Cited by 327
Index providers: Whales behind the scenes of ETFs
An, Y., Benetton, M., & Song, Y. (2023) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2023.06.003 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Egan, M., Hortaçsu, A., & Matvos, G.
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2017-01-01
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 169-216
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2201756657
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 37.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deposit Competition and Financial Fragility: Evidence from the US Banking Sector. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/aer.20150342
- The paper
- Egan, M., Hortaçsu, A., & Matvos, G. (2017). Deposit Competition and Financial Fragility: Evidence from the US Banking Sector. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150342
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.