The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overreaction in Macroeconomic Expectations
Abstract
We study the rationality of individual and consensus forecasts of macroeconomic and financial variables using the methodology of Coibion and Gorodnichenko (2015), who examine predictability of forecast errors from forecast revisions. We find that individual forecasters typically overreact to news, while consensus forecasts under-react relative to full-information rational expectations. We reconcile these findings within a diagnostic expectations version of a dispersed information learning model. Structural estimation indicates that departures from Bayesian updating in the form of diagnostic overreaction capture important variation in forecast biases across different series, yielding a belief distortion parameter similar to estimates obtained in other settings. (JEL C53, D83, D84, E13, E17, E27, E47)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency
JEGADEESH, N., & TITMAN, S. (1993) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x · Cited by 11,584
Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects
Nickell, S. (1981) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911408 · Cited by 8,735
Does the Stock Market Overreact?
De BONDT, W. F. M., & THALER, R. (1985) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05004.x · Cited by 7,578
Econometric policy evaluation: A critique
Lucas, R. E. (1976) · Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy · doi:10.1016/s0167-2231(76)80003-6 · Cited by 6,110
Investor Psychology and Security Market Under‐ and Overreactions
Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D., & Subrahmanyam, A. (1998) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00077 · Cited by 5,682
Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3 · Cited by 4,851
Implications of rational inattention
Sims, C. A. (2003) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-3932(03)00029-1 · Cited by 3,822
Automatic Lag Selection in Covariance Matrix Estimation
Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1994) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297912 · Cited by 3,235
The trouble with overconfidence.
Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.115.2.502 · Cited by 2,358
Sticky Information versus Sticky Prices: A Proposal to Replace the New Keynesian Phillips Curve
Mankiw, N. G., & Reis, R. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302320935034 · Cited by 2,292
Metadata
- Authors
- Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., Ma, Y., & Shleifer, A.
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2020-09-01
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2748-2782
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2888912427
- Cited by
- 608
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 44.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overreaction in Macroeconomic Expectations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/aer.20181219
- The paper
- Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., Ma, Y., & Shleifer, A. (2020). Overreaction in Macroeconomic Expectations. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20181219
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.