The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Immigration, Social Security, and Broader Fiscal Impacts
Abstract
Population aging and rising health costs will cause dramatic increases in federal expenditures some decades from now (Lee et al., 1999). Rising immigration to the United States may help avert this future crisis by slowing population aging and helping to pay for Social Security and public health care. But many immigrants have low education and high fertility, so their net fiscal impact may be costly rather than beneficial. This paper revisits our earlier analysis of the fiscal impact of immigration (Lee and Miller, 1997), henceforth LM97, in light of higher projected rates of productivity growth, an unexpected increase in the effective federal income tax rate in recent years, and some revisions of the demographic projections. We will emphasize implications for Social Security, and address points raised by the recent literature (Holger Bonin et al., 1998; George Borjas, 1999; Alan Auerbach and Philip Oreopolis, 2000; Kjetil Storesletten, 2000).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Another finding of the 1997 NRC report, which was later reinforced by updated analysis in Lee and Miller (2000), showed that immigration's fiscal impact is typically negative at the state and local level but positive at the federal government level.”
From New Findings on the Fiscal Impact of Immigration in the United States (2017) · cites this paper as Lee and Miller (2000)
In the citing paper
“However, after about 16 years, the impact of a representative immigrant turns positive.”
From New Findings on the Fiscal Impact of Immigration in the United States (2017) · cites this paper as Lee and Miller (2000)
In the citing paper
“Using a similar dynamic methodology, Lee and Miller (2000) found that the initial fiscal impact of immigrants and their households is negative due to their low initial earnings and the costs of schooling their children.”
From New Findings on the Fiscal Impact of Immigration in the United States (2017) · cites this paper as Lee and Miller (2000)
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Lee Ronald, 1992, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 659
- 10.1086/262120 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New Findings on the Fiscal Impact of Immigration in the United States
Dallas, F. R. B. O., & Orrenius, P. M. (2017) · Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Papers · doi:10.24149/wp1704 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, R., & Miller, T.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2000-05-01
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 350-354
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039145663
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
- Keywords
- immigration, fiscal impact of immigration, social security, population aging, health care costs, federal spending, productivity growth, population projections, fertility, public finance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immigration, Social Security, and Broader Fiscal Impacts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/aer.90.2.350
- The paper
- Lee, R., & Miller, T. (2000). Immigration, Social Security, and Broader Fiscal Impacts. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.2.350