The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Pluralism of Fairness Ideals: An Experimental Approach
Open accessAbstract
A core question in the contemporary debate on distributive justice is how to understand fairness in situations involving production. Important theories of distributive justice, such as strict egalitarianism, liberal egalitarianism, and libertarianism, provide different answers to this question. This paper presents the results from a dictator game where the distribution phase is preceded by a production phase. Each player's contribution is a result of a freely chosen investment level and an exogenously given rate of return. We estimate simultaneously the prevalence of three principles of distributive justice among the players and the distribution of the weight they attach to fairness. (JEL D63)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302760193904 · Cited by 3,970
Cited by
Prosociality predicts health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic
Campos-Mercade, P., Meier, A. N., Schneider, F. H., & Wengström, E. (2021) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104367 · Cited by 242
What Goes Around Comes Around: The Evolutionary Roots of the Belief in Immanent Justice
Baumard, N., & Chevallier, C. (2012) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/156853712x633938 · Cited by 46
Effects of Poverty on Impatience: Preferences or Inattention?
Bartos, V., Bauer, M., Chytilová, J., & Levely, I. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3247690 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Cappelen, A. W., Hole, A. D., Sørensen, E. Ø., & Tungodden, B.
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2007-05-01
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 818-827
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021931747
- Cited by
- 824
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 46.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
