The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anchoring Effects: Evidence from Art Auctions
Abstract
This paper shows that the price of a painting sold at an art auction and the experts' pre-sale valuations are anchored on the price at which the painting previously sold at auction. We are able to separate anchoring from rational learning by using the identifying strategy that the unobservable component of quality for a particular painting remains constant between the last auction sale and the current auction sale. We interpret these results as anchoring on the part of the buyers, with the sellers and auctioneers either anticipating anchoring on the part of the buyers or exhibiting anchoring effects themselves. (JEL D44, Z11)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Decision, Probability and Utility · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,474
A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding
Milgrom, P. R., & Weber, R. J. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911865 · Cited by 3,753
A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences
Koszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2006) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/121.4.1133 · Cited by 2,728
Prospect Theory and Asset Prices
Barberis, N., Huang, M., & Santos, T. (2001) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355301556310 · Cited by 1,895
Loss Aversion and Seller Behavior: Evidence from the Housing Market
Genesove, D., & Mayer, C. (2001) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355301753265561 · Cited by 1,628
Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1987) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(87)90046-x · Cited by 1,073
Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings
Kahneman, D. (1992) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90015-y · Cited by 728
Judgments of and by representativeness
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982) · Judgment under Uncertainty · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809477.007 · Cited by 603
Art as an Investment and the Underperformance of Masterpieces
Mei, J., & Moses, M. (2002) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282802762024719 · Cited by 538
Cited by
One Swallow Doesn't Make a Summer: New Evidence on Anchoring Effects
Maniadis, Z., Tufano, F., & List, J. A. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.1.277 · Cited by 280
Minimum Payments and Debt Paydown in Consumer Credit Cards
Keys, B., & Wang, J. (2016) · doi:10.3386/w22742 · Cited by 39
Narcissism and the art market performance
Zhou, Y. (2017) · The European Journal of Finance · doi:10.1080/1351847x.2016.1151804 · Cited by 19
Experience and Brokerage in Asset Markets: Evidence from Art Auctions
Bruno, B., Garcia‐Appendini, E., & Nocera, G. (2018) · Financial Management · doi:10.1111/fima.12207
Metadata
- Authors
- Beggs, A., & Graddy, K.
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2009-05-01
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1027-1039
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160739896
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 13.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anchoring Effects: Evidence from Art Auctions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/aer.99.3.1027
- The paper
- Beggs, A., & Graddy, K. (2009). Anchoring Effects: Evidence from Art Auctions. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.3.1027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.