Satisficing: Integrating Two Traditions
Open accessAbstract
In 1955, Herbert Simon introduced the notion of satisficing: an agent satisfices by searching for an alternative that meets an aspiration level but does not optimize. We survey more than 60 years of advances in understanding satisficing in economics, psychology, and management, identifying two research traditions that address two classes of situations: under risk, satisficing is typically inferior to optimization strategies and modeled according to the neoclassical framework; under uncertainty, satisficing strategies are often derived empirically and can be highly effective. We integrate the two research traditions and show the conditions under which satisficing can be rational. (JEL D11, D80, D90)
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A lack of critical thinking may also manifest through accepting a solution that merely meets a baseline aspirational threshold.
“A lack of critical thinking may also manifest through accepting a solution that merely meets a baseline aspirational threshold [6,119] -in such cases, the AI solution is correct (albeit potentially of poor quality) and therefore not overreliance, strictly speaking.”
From The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge Workers (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
Section 2.3 (Satisficing: Definition; page not provided) describes stopping the search at the first alternative that meets or exceeds an aspiration level. It does not characterize doing so as a lack of critical thinking; section 4.1 (Cost-Benefit Trade-Off; page not provided) instead discusses reasons a simpler decision strategy can be rational. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 193 · Cited by 90
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- Aleskerov, Fuad, Denis Bouyssou, and Bernard Monjardet. 2007. Utility Maximization, Choice and Preference. 2 ed. Berlin: Springer.
- Artinger, Florian M., Gerd Gigerenzer, and Perke Jacobs. 2020. "How Taxi Drivers Terminate Their Shifts When Earnings Are Hard to Predict." https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3728515.
- Artinger, Florian M., Nikita Kozodi, Florian Wangenheim, and Gerd Gigerenzer. 2018. "Recency: Prediction with Smart Data." In American Marketing Association Winter Conference Proceedings: Integrating Paradigms in a World Where Marketing Is Everywhere, Vol. 29, ed. Jacob Goldenberg, Juliano Laran, and Andrew Stephen, L2-6. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
- Czerlinski, Jean, Gerd Gigerenzer, and Daniel G. Goldstein. 1999. "How Good Are Simple Heuristics?" In Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, edited by Gerd Gigerenzer, Peter M. Todd, and ABC Research Group, 97-118. Evolution and Cognition series. New York: Oxford University Press.
- DeGroot, Morris H. 1970. Optimal Statistical Decisions. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
- Dembo, Tamara. 1931. "Der Ärger als dynamisches Problem." Psychologische Forschung 15 (1-2): 1-144.
- Fishburn, Peter C. 1977. "Mean-Risk Analysis with Risk Associated with Below-Target Returns." American Economic Review 67 (2): 116-26.
- Friedman, Daniel. 1998. "Monty Hall's Three Doors: Construction and Deconstruction of a Choice Anomaly." American Economic Review 88 (4): 933-46.
- Friedman, Milton. 1953. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Gigerenzer, Gerd, Ralph Hertwig, and Thorsten Pachur, eds. 2011. Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Gigerenzer, Gerd, Peter M. Todd, and ABC Research Group. 1999. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Evolution and Cognition series. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Gilboa, Itzhak, and David Schmeidler. 1995. "CaseBased Decision Theory." Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (3): 605-39.
- Jacobs, Rodney L., and Robert A. Jones. 1980. "Price Expectations in the United States: 1947-75." American Economic Review 70 (3): 269-77.
- James, W., and Charles Stein. 1961. "Estimation with Quadratic Loss." In Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 1, Contributions to the Theory of Statistics, ed. Jerzy Neyman, 361-79. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
- Kay, John, and Mervyn King. 2020. Radical Uncertainty: Decision-Making for an Unknowable Future. London: Bridge Street Press.
- Kunreuther, Howard. 1976. "Limited Knowledge and Insurance Protection." Public Policy 24 (2): 227-61.
- March, James G., and Herbert A. Simon. 1958. Organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
- Nelson, Richard R., and Sidney G. Winter. 1973. "Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Economic Capabilities." American Economic Review 63 (2): 440-49.
- Nelson, Richard R., and Sidney G. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
- Pearl, Judea. 1984. Heuristics: Intelligent Search Strategies for Computer Problem Solving. The Addison-Wesley Series in Artificial Intelligence. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
- Sauermann, Heinz, and Reinhard Selten. 1962. "Anspruchsanpassungstheorie der Unternehmung." Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft" Zeit für die gesamte Staatwissenschaft 118 (4): 577-97.
- Savage, Leonard J. 1954. The Foundations of Statistics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
- Selten, Reinhard. 2001. "What Is Bounded Rationality?" In Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox, edited by Gerd Gigerenzer and Reinhard Selten, 13-36. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Simon, Herbert A. 1957. Models of Man: Social and Rational. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
- Simon, Herbert A. 1959. "Theories of Decision Making in Economics and Behavioral Science." American Economic Review 49 (3): 253-83.
- Simon, Herbert A. 1979. "Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations." American Economic Review 69 (4): 493-513.
- Simon, Herbert A. 1981. The Sciences of the Artificial. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Telser, L.G. 1973. "Searching for the Lowest Price." American Economic Review 63 (2): 40-49.
- Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1974. "Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases." Science 185 (4157): 1124-31.
- von Hayek, F.A. 1945. "The Use of Knowledge in Society." American Economic Review 35 (4): 519-30.
- Varian, Hal R. 1980. "A Model of Sales." American Economic Review 70 (4): 651-59.
- von Neumann, John, and Oskar Morgenstern. 1944. The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Wald, Abraham. 1950. Statistical Decision Functions. New York: Wiley.
- Winter, Sidney G. 2000. "The Satisficing Principle in Capability Learning." Strategic Management Journal 21 (10-11): 981-96.
- Authors
- Artinger, F. M., Gigerenzer, G., & Jacobs, P.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Literature
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2022-06-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 598-635
- ISSN
- 0022-0515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3118038935
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 193
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 12.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Literature (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- satisficing, Herbert Simon, bounded rationality, aspiration levels, uncertainty, rationality, decision-making, neoclassical economics, behavioral economics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review