Nine Facts about Top Journals in Economics
Abstract
How has publishing in top economics journals changed since 1970? Using a data set that combines information on all articles published in the top-five journals from 1970 to 2012 with their Google Scholar citations, we identify nine key trends. First, annual submissions to the top-five journals nearly doubled from 1990 to 2012. Second, the total number of articles published in these journals actually declined from 400 per year in the late 1970s to 300 per year most recently. As a result, the acceptance rate has fallen from 15 percent to 6 percent, with potential implications for the career progression of young scholars. Third, one journal, the American Economic Review, now accounts for 40 percent of top-five publications, up from 25 percent in the 1970s. Fourth, recently published papers are on average three times longer than they were in the 1970s, contributing to the relative shortage of journal space. Fifth, the number of authors per paper has increased from 1.3 in 1970 to 2.3 in 2012, partly offsetting the fall in the number of articles per year. Sixth, citations for top-five publications are high: among papers published in the late 1990s, the median number of Google Scholar citations is 200. Seventh, the ranking of journals by citations has remained relatively stable, with the notable exception of the Quarterly Journal of Economics, which climbed from fourth place to first place over the past three decades. Eighth, citation counts are significantly higher for longer papers…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Card and DellaVigna (2013) created a classification mapping JEL codes into fields.
“Card and DellaVigna (2013) create a classification to map different JEL codes into different fields.”
From Technology and Big Data Are Changing Economics: Mining Text to Track Methods (2020) · cites this paper as Card and DellaVigna (2013)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Methods Matter: p-Hacking and Publication Bias in Causal Analysis in Economics
Brodeur, A., Cook, N., & Heyes, A. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20190687 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
What Do Editors Maximize? Evidence from Four Economics Journals
Card, D., & DellaVigna, S. (2020) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00839 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Self-citationTechnology and Big Data Are Changing Economics: Mining Text to Track Methods
Currie, J., Kleven, H., & Zwiers, E. (2020) · AEA Papers and Proceedings · doi:10.1257/pandp.20201058 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Bramoullé, Y., & Ductor, L. (2018) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2018.01.014 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
- Authors
- Card, D., & DellaVigna, S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- ORCID
- Card, David
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Literature
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2013-03-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 144-161
- ISSN
- 0022-0515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2272387771
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 20.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Literature (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Keywords
- manuscript submission, acceptance rate, citation trends, Google Scholar Citations, American Economic Review, authorship trends, paper length, journal rankings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review