The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exchange Rate Predictability
Open accessAbstract
The main goal of this article is to provide an answer to the question: does anything forecast exchange rates, and if so, which variables? It is well known that exchange rate fluctuations are very difficult to predict using economic models, and that a random walk forecasts exchange rates better than any economic model (the Meese and Rogoff puzzle). However, the recent literature has identified a series of fundamentals/methodologies that claim to have resolved the puzzle. This article provides a critical review of the recent literature on exchange rate forecasting and illustrates the new methodologies and fundamentals that have been recently proposed in an up-to-date, thorough empirical analysis. Overall, our analysis of the literature and the data suggests that the answer to the question: “Are exchange rates predictable?” is, “It depends”—on the choice of predictor, forecast horizon, sample period, model, and forecast evaluation method. Predictability is most apparent when one or more of the following hold: the predictors are Taylor rule or net foreign assets, the model is linear, and a small number of parameters are estimated. The toughest benchmark is the random walk without drift. (JEL C53, F31, F37, E43, E52)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1987) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913610 · Cited by 16,936
Discretion versus policy rules in practice
Taylor, J. B. (1993) · Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy · doi:10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-l · Cited by 9,065
Diebold, F. X., & Mariano, R. S. (1995) · Journal of Business & Economic Statistics · doi:10.1080/07350015.1995.10524599 · Cited by 5,130
A Simple Estimator of Cointegrating Vectors in Higher Order Integrated Systems
Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (1993) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2951763 · Cited by 5,013
Empirical exchange rate models of the seventies
Meese, R. A., & Rogoff, K. (1983) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/0022-1996(83)90017-x · Cited by 4,107
Lane, P. R., & Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. (2007) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2007.02.003 · Cited by 2,513
Approximately normal tests for equal predictive accuracy in nested models
Clark, T. E., & West, K. D. (2007) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.05.023 · Cited by 2,489
Monetary policy rules in practice
Clarida, R. H., Jordi Galí, Y., & Gertler, M. L. (1998) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/s0014-2921(98)00016-6 · Cited by 2,163
Forward and spot exchange rates
Fama, E. F. (1984) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-3932(84)90046-1 · Cited by 2,145
Tests of Conditional Predictive Ability
Giacomini, R., & White, H. (2006) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00718.x · Cited by 1,646
Metadata
- Authors
- Rossi, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Literature
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2013-12-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1063-1119
- ISSN
- 0022-0515 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3121853541
- Cited by
- 649
- References
- 90
- FWCI
- 96.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exchange Rate Predictability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/jel.51.4.1063
- The paper
- Rossi, B. (2013). Exchange Rate Predictability. Journal of Economic Literature. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.4.1063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.