Cited by 1,898Intergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesIncome, Poverty, and InequalityLabor market dynamics and wage inequality

Income Inequality, Equality of Opportunity, and Intergenerational Mobility

Corak, Miles·2013·Journal of Economic Perspectives

Abstract

My focus is on the degree to which increasing inequality in the high-income countries, particularly in the United States, is likely to limit economic mobility for the next generation of young adults. I discuss the underlying drivers of opportunity that generate the relationship between inequality and intergenerational mobility. The goal is to explain why America differs from other countries, how intergenerational mobility will change in an era of higher inequality, and how the process is different for the top 1 percent. I begin by presenting evidence that countries with more inequality at one point in time also experience less earnings mobility across the generations, a relationship that has been called “The Great Gatsby Curve.” The interaction between families, labor markets, and public policies all structure a child's opportunities and determine the extent to which adult earnings are related to family background—but they do so in different ways across national contexts. Both cross-country comparisons and the underlying trends suggest that these drivers are all configured most likely to lower, or at least not raise, the degree of intergenerational earnings mobility for the next generation of Americans coming of age in a more polarized labor market. This trend will likely continue unless there are changes in public policy that promote the human capital of children in a way that offers relatively greater benefits to the relatively disadvantaged.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/jep.27.3.79

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Monetary investments are diverging between families at different places along the income scale.

    “monetary investments are likewise diverging between families at different places along the income scale (Corak 2013;Kornrich and Furstenberg 2012;Schneider, Hastings, and LaBriola 2018”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Corak 2013

  • Corak (2013), Kornrich and Furstenberg (2012), and Schneider, Hastings, and LaBriola (2018) observe a large increase in the gap in spending on children between high- and low-income households from the 1970s to the 2000s.

    “Corak (2013), Kornrich and Furstenberg (2012), and Schneider, Hastings, and LaBriola (2018) observe a large increase in the gap in spending on children between high-and low-income households from the 1970s to the 2000s.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Corak (2013)

  • Parental inputs of money and time have become more unequal across the income scale in different countries.

    “There is, indeed, clear evidence that parental inputs of money and time have become more unequal across the income scale in different countries (Ramey and Ramey 2010;Kornrich and Furstenberg 2012;Corak 2013;Schneider, Hastings, and LaBriola 2018;Doepke and Zilibotti 2019).”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Corak 2013

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corak, M.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Corak, Miles
Venue
Journal of Economic Perspectives
Published
2013-08-01
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
79-102
ISSN
0895-3309 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122216841
Cited by
1,898
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 98 · 2025: 196 · 2024: 165 · 2023: 171 · 2022: 189 · 2021: 191 · 2020: 141 · 2019: 125 · 2018: 177 · 2017: 102 · 2016: 129 · 2015: 125 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 2
FWCI
351.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Economic Perspectives (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Keywords
income inequality, intergenerational mobility, earnings mobility, Great Gatsby Curve, equal opportunities, family background, top 1 percent, labor market polarization, human capital, public policy, cross-national comparison, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review