Enhancing the Efficacy of Teacher Incentives through Framing: A Field Experiment*
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Changing the default outcome of conditional reimbursement from 'reimbursement is maintained if the intervention meets the criteria' to 'reimbursement is reversed, unless the intervention meets the criteria' has shown to be important psychologically.
“Although this difference may seem trivial, it has shown to be important psychologically [45, 46].”
From What influences the outcome of active disinvestment processes in healthcare? A qualitative interview study on five recent cases of active disinvestment (2021) · cites this paper as [45]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 7
- Authors
- Sadoff, S.
- Corresponding author
- Sadoff, Sally
- Venue
- AEA Randomized Controlled Trials
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2019-05-02
- OpenAlex
- W4252639475
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- AEA Randomized Controlled Trials (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- teacher incentives, framing effects, teacher evaluation, teacher compensation, incentive design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
