Laboratory environments and rodents' behavioural needs: a review
Abstract
Laboratory housing conditions have significant physiological and psychological effects on rodents, raising both scientific and humane concerns. Published studies of rats, mice and other rodents were reviewed to document behavioural and psychological problems attributable to predominant laboratory housing conditions. Studies indicate that rats and mice value opportunities to take cover, build nests, explore, gain social contact, and exercise some control over their social milieu, and that the inability to satisfy these needs is physically and psychologically detrimental, leading to impaired brain development and behavioural anomalies (e.g. stereotypies). To the extent that space is a means to gain access to such resources, spatial confinement likely exacerbates these deficits. Adding environmental 'enrichments' to small cages reduces but does not eliminate these problems, and I argue that substantial changes in housing and husbandry conditions would be needed to further reduce them.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the laboratory, mice and rats prefer social company over being alone.
“In a laboratory setting, mice and rats prefer social company (even that of other males) over a solitary existence42,43.”
From Neural mechanisms of social homeostasis (2019) · cites this paper as [42]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 114 · Cited by 176
- Authors
- Balcombe, J. P.
- Affiliations
- Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Balcombe, J P
- Venue
- Laboratory Animals
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-07-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 217-235
- ISSN
- 0023-6772 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-1117
- OpenAlex
- W2161147746
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 114
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 8.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Laboratory Animals (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- WBI Studies Repository (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- rodents, behavioral needs, animal welfare, environmental enrichment, stereotypy, spatial confinement, nest building, social contact, physical activity, rats, mice, husbandry
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Welfare, Animals, Laboratory, Behavior, Animal, Female, Housing, Animal, Male, Social Environment, Mice, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review