Cited by 54Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealthcare Systems and Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

What constitutes success in telehealth?

Wootton, R, Hebert, M A·2001·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

Before telehealth applications can be judged, there must be some general understanding about what constitutes success. At first sight it seems that defining success in a telehealth application should be relatively easy: a successful application is one that produces high-quality care at low cost. However, the calculation of cost requires some care, since it depends on assuming a particular financial perspective (the patient's, the health-care provider's, or society's) and is meaningless without a statement of the workload being handled. Other factors include the context in which the service is being delivered. Ultimately, the political imperative may override any rational judgement of success.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/1357633011937245

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1136/bmj.313.7069.1375 · DOI
  2. Burton MJ, 2001, The Cochrane Library, 1
  3. 10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.249 · DOI
  4. 10.1258/1357633971930184 · DOI
  5. 10.1258/1357633991933576 · DOI
  6. 10.1258/1357633001935905 · DOI
  7. 10.1258/1357633991932379 · DOI
  8. 10.1258/1357633001934438 · DOI
  9. 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1252 · DOI
  10. 10.1258/1357633011936453 · DOI
  11. 10.1258/1357633971930139 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wootton, R., & Hebert, M. A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2001-12
Volume
7
Issue
2_suppl
Pages
3-7
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2058493348
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Technology
Keywords
telemedicine, success criteria, quality of care, cost-effectiveness, financial perspective, workload, political factors
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Program Evaluation, Health Care Costs, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review