A systematic review of telephone-based interventions for mental disorders
Abstract
To assess the effectiveness of telephone-based interventions for mental illness, a systematic search of the literature was conducted using the databases PsycINFO and PubMed, and the search engine Google Scholar. The search identified 14 studies evaluating telephone-based interventions in the areas of depression ( n = 6), anxiety ( n = 3), eating disorders ( n = 3), substance use ( n = 1) and schizophrenia ( n = 1). Although these studies provide evidence that telephone interventions can be effective, the few studies conducted, small sample sizes and lack of randomized controlled trial methodology prevent firm conclusions from being drawn. The articles reviewed suggest that an effective telephone intervention includes clearly structured therapy sessions and homework tasks. However, further evidence using large-scale, randomized controlled trials must be obtained in order to inform government and telephone counselling agencies about the efficacy of telephone interventions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Telephone therapy for mild depression improved symptom scores in one small study included in another review.
“Telephone therapy for mild depression also improved symptom scores in one small study that was included in another review [53].”
From The Impact of Telehealthcare on the Quality and Safety of Care: A Systematic Overview (2013) · cites this paper as [53]
Telephone therapy did not make a statistically significant difference to hospital readmission for schizophrenia in one review of mental health.
“Telephone therapy did not make a statistically significant difference to hospital readmission for schizophrenia in one review of mental health [53].”
From The Impact of Telehealthcare on the Quality and Safety of Care: A Systematic Overview (2013) · cites this paper as [53]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 94
- Authors
- Leach, L. S., & Christensen, H.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- Venue
- Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-04-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 122-129
- ISSN
- 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-1109
- OpenAlex
- W2023585394
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 6.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- telephone-delivered intervention, telephone counseling, mental illness, depression, anxiety, eating disorders, substance use disorders, schizophrenia, homework, intervention efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety Disorders, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Mental Disorders, Counseling, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Schizophrenia, Telephone, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Remote Consultation, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review