Cited by 16Reproductive tract infections researchHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsSyphilis Diagnosis and Treatment

Is accelerated partner therapy a feasible and acceptable strategy for rapid partner notification in the UK?: a qualitative study of genitourinary medicine clinic attenders

Sutcliffe, L, Brook, M G, Chapman, J L, Cassell, J M, Estcourt, C S·2009·International Journal of STD & AIDS

Abstract

Partner notification (PN) in the UK is of limited effectiveness. Expedited partner therapy improves PN outcomes but does not comply with existing UK professional guidance. We developed two new strategies, known as accelerated partner therapy (APT), based on elements of PN practice for which there is evidence of efficacy, and which conform to UK prescribing guidance. We explored the acceptability and feasibility of these models qualitatively in genitourinary medicine clinic attenders. Both strategies were viewed favourably. Preference was influenced by age, relationship type, whether participants were delivering or receiving APT and whether the sex partner was aware of the participant's clinic visit. APT provides a new approach to PN, which has strong patient support and complies with existing UK regulations. The complex factors that influence patients' choice of PN method suggest that provision of a range of PN options including APT may be central to improving the effectiveness of PN in the UK.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/ijsa.2009.009036

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 16

Authors
Sutcliffe, L., Brook, M. G., Chapman, J. L., Cassell, J. M., & Estcourt, C. S.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • Central Middlesex Hospital (GB)
  • Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
Corresponding author
Sutcliffe, L
Venue
International Journal of STD & AIDS
Published
2009-09
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
603-606
ISSN
  • 0956-4624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1052
OpenAlex
W2003806414
Cited by
16
References
13
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of STD & AIDS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
partner notification, sexually transmitted infections, acceptability, feasibility, patient preferences, relationship type
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Sexual Partners, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Contact Tracing, Female Urogenital Diseases, Male Urogenital Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review