Cited by 292Child Abuse and TraumaStress Responses and CortisolPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

The link between child abuse and psychopathology: A review of neurobiological and genetic research

Open access
McCrory, Eamon, De Brito, Stephane A, Viding, Essi·2012·Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Abstract

Childhood abuse is associated with later psychopathology, including conduct disorder, antisocial personality disorder, anxiety and depression as well as a heightened risk of health and social problems. However, the neurobiological mechanisms by which childhood adversity increases vulnerability to psychopathology remain poorly understood. There is likely to be a complex interaction between environmental experiences (such as abuse) and individual differences in risk versus protective genes, which influences the neurobiological circuitry underpinning psychological and emotional development. Neuroendocrine studies indicate an association between early adversity and atypical development of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis stress response, which may predispose to psychiatric vulnerability in adulthood. Brain imaging research in children and adults is providing evidence of several structural and functional brain differences associated with early adversity. Structural differences have been reported in the corpus callosum, cerebellum and prefrontal cortex. Functional differences have been reported in regions implicated in emotional and behavioural regulation, including the amygdala and anterior cingulate cortex. These differences at the neurobiological level may represent adaptations to early experiences of heightened stress that lead to an increased risk of psychopathology. We also consider the clinical implications of future neurobiological and genetic research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110222

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alterations to the HPA axis functioning have been observed in humans exposed to childhood adversity, although variation in the timing, duration and type of adversity have led to differences in strength and direction of response.

    “Alterations to the HPA axis functioning have also been observed in humans exposed to childhood adversity, although variation in the timing, duration and type of adversity have led to differences in strength and direction of response (Nemeroff 2004; Bosch et al. 2012; McCrory et al. 2012).”
  • Childhood adversity may negatively interfere with emotion regulation development through both premature activation of biological stress systems and maladaptive social learning.

    “In summary, childhood adversity may negatively interfere with emotion regulation development through both premature activation of biological stress systems and maladaptive social learning.”
  • The immature status of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and prefrontal-amygdala circuits renders stress systems susceptible to lifelong structural and functional alteration following childhood adversity.

    “the immature status of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the prefrontal-amygdala circuits, for example, renders these stress systems susceptible to lifelong structural and functional alteration following childhood adversity (for review see Lupien, McEwen, Gunnar, & Heim, 2009; McCrory et al., 2012).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 292

Authors
McCrory, E., De Brito, S. A., & Viding, E.
Affiliations
  • National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (GB)
  • University College London (UCL), London WC1H 0AP, UK
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
McCrory, Eamon
Venue
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Published
2012-04
Volume
105
Issue
4
Pages
151-156
ISSN
  • 0141-0768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1095
OpenAlex
W2171787514
Cited by
292
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G000131/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
child abuse, childhood adversity, psychopathology, neurobiology of stress, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, genetic susceptibility, conduct disorder, antisocial personality disorder, anxiety, depression, brain structure, corpus callosum, cerebellum, prefrontal cortex, amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex, emotion regulation, protective genes
MeSH terms
Adult, Aging, Brain, Child, Child Abuse, Corpus Callosum, Hippocampus, Humans, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Neurobiology, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Risk Factors, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review