Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 49Medication Adherence and ComplianceAsthma and respiratory diseasesAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adolescent Treatment Compliance in Asthma

Open access
Dinwiddie, R, Müller, W G·2002·Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
DOI 10.1258/jrsm.95.2.68PMC PMC1279313
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The term compliance is defined in the dictionary as ‘to consent’ or ‘to do as asked’. With adolescent behaviour these two definitions are not the same thing: many adolescents will consent to treatment in the clinic but do not do as asked when they return to normal day-to-day life. The term adherence in relation to treatment is also widely used and is defined as ‘wilful intention’. Non-adherence would therefore be the wilful intention not to do something. Ordinarily, the word compliance refers to taking the correct dose of prescribed medication at the correct intervals. In real life doses are often omitted and the intervals between doses are commonly longer than they should be; a rarer form of non-compliance is over-consumption of medication. Yet compliance affects many other aspects of the management of chronic conditions, such as avoidance of aggravating factors, monitoring, appointment-keeping, prevention or applying an emergency plan of action when needed. The term concordance has also been introduced to reflect an alliance of equals, professional and patient, rather than one-sided obedience1. The direct involvement of patients in decision-making is now central to policy in the National Health Service. However, the concordance concept is not discussed further in the current review because of the scarcity of evidence-based data on its application to asthma treatment. Here we review the complex issues of compliance with asthma treatment in adolescence and how they can be assessed, understood and addressed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/014107680209500204

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain., 1997, From Compliance to Concordance: Achieving Shared Goals in Medicine Taking.
  2. 10.1001/archinte.1977.03630150030010 · DOI
  3. Sackett DL., 1976, Compliance with Therapeutic Regimes.
  4. Cochrane M., 1999, Resp Dis Pract, 16, 17
  5. Haynes R.B., 2001, The Cochrane Library
  6. Venables T.L., 1996, Br J Clin Res, 7, 15
  7. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199911)28:5<337::AID-PPUL5>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
  8. Barnes P.J., 1995, Am J Resp Crit Care Med, 151, 1053
  9. 10.1002/1099-0496(200008)30:2<97::AID-PPUL4>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Dinwiddie, R., & Müller, W. G.
Affiliations
Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
Venue
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2002-02
Volume
95
Issue
2
Pages
68-71
ISSN
  • 0141-0768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1095
DOI
10.1258/jrsm.95.2.68
PMC
PMC1279313
OpenAlex
W2139468806
Cited by
49
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Keywords
asthma, adolescents, medication adherence, non-compliance, concordance, patient involvement in treatment decisions, asthma management, dose omission, medication overuse
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Asthma, Attitude to Health, Cooperative Behavior, Decision Making, Humans, Treatment Refusal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.