CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 117Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationTechnology Use by Older AdultsMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Therapeutic videoconferencing interventions for the treatment of long-term conditions

Steel, Katie, Cox, Diane, Garry, Heather·2011·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
DOI 10.1258/jtt.2010.100318
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review of literature relating to videoconferencing in therapeutic interventions for chronic conditions. Two hundred articles were reviewed in detail, 35 of which were relevant to the study. Of these, eight were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the remainder were service evaluations, pilot studies and case studies. Two major themes emerged, relating specifically to videoconferencing: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. There were 14 studies which measured clinical outcomes of interventions for chronic conditions delivered by videoconferencing. A range of evidence, including four RCTs of high quality, indicates that interventions for a variety of conditions, including psychological and physical, delivered by videoconferencing produce similar outcomes to treatment delivered in-person. Evidence suggests that levels of patient satisfaction with telerehabilitation are high and that the formation of a good therapeutic alliance is possible. Several papers reported that clinical staff showed lower levels of satisfaction in using telerehabilitation than patients. It is feasible to use videoconferencing as a means of delivering therapeutic interventions for people with chronic conditions in rural communities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/jtt.2010.100318

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. SteelK, CoxDL, GarryH. Videoconferencing for delivery of CFS/ME interventions at home: tele-rehabilitation. Systematic review: final report. Cumbria: Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and ME Northern Clinical Network, 2009
  2. SanfordJ, HoenigH. Virtual therapy: using video-teleconferencing to provide rehabilitation interventions to older adults at home. Gerontologist 2004;44:208

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 117

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Steel, K., Cox, D., & Garry, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Cumbria (GB)
  • Keswick Community Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Steel, Katie
ORCID
Cox, Diane
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2011-02-21
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
109-117
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
DOI
10.1258/jtt.2010.100318
OpenAlex
W1990105495
Cited by
117
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Insight (University of Cumbria) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
videoconferencing, telerehabilitation, chronic disease, remote therapy delivery, patient satisfaction, therapeutic relationship, clinical outcomes, rural health care, telemedicine
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Humans, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Remote Consultation, Videoconferencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review