Mental health professionals' perspectives of telemental health with remote and rural First Nations communities
Open accessAbstract
We conducted an online survey and interviews amongst mental health workers in Canada who reported experience in working with rural and remote First Nations (although not necessarily telemental health). Sixty-three respondents (of the 164) to the online survey reported experience in working with clients in remote and rural First Nations. Only 16 of the online survey respondents with remote and rural First Nations experience reported having received training in videoconferencing use. When asked how frequently they used videoconferencing with clients, 51% reported never using it, 19% used it once every few months and 10% reported using it a few times a month. Approximately 50% of participants reported finding it useful. Approximately 38% found the technology easy or very easy to use, and 15% found it very difficult. Individual in-depth interviews were also conducted with professionals who had First Nations telemental health experience specifically ( n = 5). A quantitative data analysis was used to explore their perceptions of usefulness and ease of use of telemental health, as well as the relationships among these constructs. Advantages, disadvantages and challenges in using the technology were identified from the qualitative data. Promising ways forward include incorporating traditional practices and the Seven Teachings into telemental health services.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some people may prefer long-distance care, including children with developmental disabilities and some First Nations community members who preferred an outside person.
“Some individuals may prefer long-distance care such as children with developmental disabilities36 and some individuals in a First Nations community who preferred to talk to someone from outside the community.45”
From Task-sharing approaches to improve mental health care in rural and other low-resource settings: a systematic review (2018) · cites this paper as [45]
Small rural clinics can make confidential discussion space hard to find, as can home visits where providers meet family or friends.
“Small rural clinics can present challenges to finding confidential space for discussions,45 as can home visits where providers may encounter family or friends.62”
From Task-sharing approaches to improve mental health care in rural and other low-resource settings: a systematic review (2018) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 9 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Gibson, K., O'Donnell, S., Coulson, H., & Kakepetum-Schultz, T.
- Affiliations
- National Research Council Canada (CA)
- National Research Council of Canada, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
- Sioux Lookout First Nations Health Authority (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Gibson, Kerri
- Venue
- Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 263-267
- ISSN
- 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-1109
- OpenAlex
- W2321587354
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NPARC (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- telemental health, videoconferencing, First Nations, mental health professionals, professional perspectives, technology adoption, ease of use, training needs
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Computers, Canada, Data Collection, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Health Services, Indigenous, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Minority Groups, Patient Education as Topic, Rural Population, Telemedicine, Remote Consultation, Videoconferencing, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review