Cited by 62Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsMental Health Treatment and Access

Mental health professionals' perspectives of telemental health with remote and rural First Nations communities

Open access
Gibson, Kerri, O'Donnell, Susan, Coulson, Heather, Kakepetum-Schultz, Tina·2011·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

We conducted an online survey and interviews amongst mental health workers in Canada who reported experience in working with rural and remote First Nations (although not necessarily telemental health). Sixty-three respondents (of the 164) to the online survey reported experience in working with clients in remote and rural First Nations. Only 16 of the online survey respondents with remote and rural First Nations experience reported having received training in videoconferencing use. When asked how frequently they used videoconferencing with clients, 51% reported never using it, 19% used it once every few months and 10% reported using it a few times a month. Approximately 50% of participants reported finding it useful. Approximately 38% found the technology easy or very easy to use, and 15% found it very difficult. Individual in-depth interviews were also conducted with professionals who had First Nations telemental health experience specifically ( n = 5). A quantitative data analysis was used to explore their perceptions of usefulness and ease of use of telemental health, as well as the relationships among these constructs. Advantages, disadvantages and challenges in using the technology were identified from the qualitative data. Promising ways forward include incorporating traditional practices and the Seven Teachings into telemental health services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/jtt.2011.101011

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 9 · Cited by 62

Authors
Gibson, K., O'Donnell, S., Coulson, H., & Kakepetum-Schultz, T.
Affiliations
  • National Research Council Canada (CA)
  • National Research Council of Canada, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
  • Sioux Lookout First Nations Health Authority (CA)
Corresponding author
Gibson, Kerri
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2011-07
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
263-267
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2321587354
Cited by
62
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NPARC (submittedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
telemental health, videoconferencing, First Nations, mental health professionals, professional perspectives, technology adoption, ease of use, training needs
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Computers, Canada, Data Collection, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Health Services, Indigenous, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Minority Groups, Patient Education as Topic, Rural Population, Telemedicine, Remote Consultation, Videoconferencing, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review