A guide to defining and implementing protocols for the welfare assessment of laboratory animals: eleventh report of the BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement
Open accessAbstract
The refinement of husbandry and procedures to reduce animal suffering and improve welfare is an essential component of humane science. Successful refinement depends upon the ability to assess animal welfare effectively, and detect any signs of pain or distress as rapidly as possible, so that any suffering can be alleviated. This document provides practical guidance on setting up and operating effective protocols for the welfare assessment of animals used in research and testing. It sets out general principles for more objective observation of animals, recognizing and assessing indicators of pain or distress and tailoring these to individual projects. Systems for recording indicators, including score sheets, are reviewed and guidance is set out on determining practical monitoring regimes that are more likely to detect any signs of suffering. This guidance is intended for all staff required to assess or monitor animal welfare, including animal technologists and care staff, veterinarians and scientists. It will also be of use to members of ethics or animal care and use committees. A longer version of this document, with further background information and extra topics including training and information sharing, is available on the Laboratory Animals website.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nocturnal animals may not show behavioural signs of discomfort during the day.
“For example, nocturnal animals may not show behavioural signs of discomfort during the day [134].”
From Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 (2020) · cites this paper as [134]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 204
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- [5]5. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR). Recognition and Alleviation of Distress in Laboratory Animals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2008 Google Scholar a [...] is an important component of good science. b [...] animal is not necessarily natural.
- [6]6. Morton DB, Griffiths PHM. Guidelines on the recognition of pain, distress and discomfort in experimental animals and an hypothesis for assessment. Vet Rec 1985;116:431–6 Go to Reference Crossref PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
- [7]7. Morton DB. Adverse effects in animals and their relevance to refining scientific procedures. ATLA 1990;18:29–39 Google Scholar
- [8]8. Firth AM, Haldane SL. Development of a scale to evaluate postoperative pain in dogs. JAVMA 1999;214:651–9 Crossref PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
- [9]9. Roughan JV, Flecknell PA. Behavioural effects of laparotomy and analgesic effects of ketoprofen and carprofen in rats. Pain 2001;90:65–74 Crossref PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar a [...] back arching, belly pressing and writhing. b [...] period, when they are predominantly active.
- [10]10. Murrell JC, Psatha EP, Scott EM, et al. Application of a modified form of the Glasgow pain scale in a veterinary teaching centre in the Netherlands. Vet Rec 2008;162:403–8 Go to Reference Crossref PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
- [11]11. Hawkins P. Recognising and assessing pain, suffering and distress in laboratory animals. Lab Anim 2002;36:378–95. See http://tinyurl.com/yc37duj (last checked 26 May 2010) Crossref Google Scholar a [...] assessments and individual opinion. b [...] and assessing welfare and animal suffering. c [...] to ensure consistency and effectiveness. d [...] complete picture of an animal's welfare. e [...] defining and implementing humane endpoints. f [...] attention and additional monitoring.
- [15]15. Schreuder MF, Fodor M, van Wijk JAE, Delemarre-van de Waal HA. Weekend versus working day: differences in telemetric blood pressure in male Wistar rats. Lab Anim 2007;41:86–91 Crossref PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
- [16]16. Burn CC, Deacon RM, Mason GJ. Marked for life? Effects of early cage-cleaning frequency, delivery batch, and identification tail-marking on rat anxiety profiles. Dev Psychobiol 2008;50:266–77 Crossref PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar a [...] identification) and euthanasia or release. b [...] animal welfare and the scientific data.
- [17]17. Dickinson AL, Leach MC, Flecknell PA. Influence of early neonatal experience on nociceptive responses and analgesic effects in rats. Lab Anim 2009;43:11–16 Go to Reference Crossref PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
- [18]18. Leach MC, Thornton PD, Main DCJ. Identification of appropriate measures for the assessment of laboratory mouse welfare. Anim Welf 2008;17:161–70 Go to Reference Crossref Web of Science Google Scholar
- [19]19. Arras M, Rettich A, Cinelli P, et al. Assessment of post-laparotomy pain in laboratory mice by telemetric recording of heart rate and heart rate variability. BMC Vet Res 2007;3:16 doi: 10.1186/1746–6148-3-16. See http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/3/16 (last checked 26 May 2010) Crossref Google Scholar a [...] complete picture of an animal's welfare. b [...] for providing a structured environment. c [...] with permission from Arras et al. · DOI
- [20]20. Wright-Williams SL, Courade J-P, Richardson CA, et al. Effects of vasectomy surgery and meloxicam treatment on faecal corticosterone levels and behaviour in tow strains of laboratory mouse. Pain 2007;130:108–18 Go to Reference Crossref PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
- [21]21. Blackburn-Munro G. Pain-like behaviours in animals – how human are they? Trends Pharmacol Sci 2004;25:299–305 Go to Reference Crossref PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
- [22]22. Langford DJ, Bailey AL, Chanda ML, et al. Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse. Nat Methods 2010;7:447–9 Go to Reference Crossref PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
- [23]23. Morton DB, Hawkins P, Bevan R, et al. Refinements in telemetry procedures. Lab Anim 2003;37:261–99 Go to Reference Crossref PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
- [25]25. Abou-Ismail UA, Burman OHP, Nicol CJ, Mendl M. Can sleep behaviour be used as an indicator of stress in group-housed rats (Rattus norvegicus)? Anim Welf 2007;16:185–8 Crossref Web of Science Google Scholar a [...] and time budget, including sleep patterns b [...] be inactive, may indicate adverse effects.
- [29]29. Hurst JL, Barnard CJ, Nevison CM, West CD. Housing and welfare in laboratory rats: welfare implications of isolation and social contact among caged males. Anim Welf 1997;6:329–47 Go to Reference Crossref Web of Science Google Scholar
- [30]30. Kirkwood JK, Roberts EA, Weddell S, et al. (eds). Quality of life: the heart of the matter. Proceedings of the UFAW/BVA Symposium. The Royal Society, London, 13–14 September 2006. Anim Welf 2007;16(Suppl. 1):1–179 Go to Reference Crossref Google Scholar
- [34]34. Shively CA, Register TC, Friedman DP, et al. Social stress-associated depression in adult female cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Biol Psychol 2005;69:67–84 Go to Reference Crossref PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
- [35]35. Olsson IAS, Nevison CM, Patterson-Kane EG, et al. Understanding behaviour: the relevance of ethological approaches in laboratory animal science. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2003;81:245–64 Go to Reference Crossref Web of Science Google Scholar
- Authors
- Hawkins, P., Morton, D. B., Burman, O., Dennison, N., Honess, P., Jennings, M., Lane, S., Middleton, V, Roughan, J. V., Wells, S., & Westwood, K.
- Affiliations
- Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (GB)
- 82150 Valeilles, France
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Home Office (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Novartis Horsham Research Centre, Wimblehurst Road, Horsham, West Sussex RH12 5AB, UK
- Huntingdon Research Centre, Woolley Road, Alconbury, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire PE28 4HS, UK
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Mary Lyon Centre at MRC Harwell (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hawkins, P
- Venue
- Laboratory Animals
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 0023-6772 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-1117
- OpenAlex
- W2100801447
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 7.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Laboratory Animals (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
- WBI Studies Repository (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Funders
- National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (G0400227/1)
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/F015631/1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
- Keywords
- animal welfare assessment, welfare assessment protocol, animal care and use committees, animal welfare training
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animal Welfare, Animals, Laboratory, Laboratory Animal Science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review