Cited by 39Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsUreteral procedures and complications

The incidence of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse: an 11-year experience

Price, Natalia, Slack, Alex, Jwarah, Eman, Jackson, Simon·2008·Menopause International

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to measure the rate of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse. Study design: An 11-year retrospective audit was conducted of women who had undergone surgery for pelvic organ prolapse between 1995 and 2005 in a large teaching hospital in the UK. Main outcome measure: Variables examined included the type of primary procedure for pelvic organ prolapse overall and per year, the type of the repeat procedure and the interval between primary and repeat procedures. Analysis included calculation of the number and proportion of primary operations, the rate of reoperation, the type of repeat prolapse operation and the cumulative risk of reoperation each year for 11 years. Results: During the study period, 2099 women underwent surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Of these women, 142 underwent a second operation for prolapse and 13 a third. The overall cumulative rate of reoperation following surgery for pelvic organ prolapse was 10.8% at 11 years following the initial procedure. The majority (61.5%) of repeat procedures did not involve the same compartment as the initial operation and recurrences tended to occur in the first few years after the first operation. Conclusion: Women who undergo surgery for pelvic organ prolapse are at 10.8% risk of requiring a reoperation within the next 11 years, usually at a different site.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/mi.2008.008029

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 39

Authors
Price, N., Slack, A., Jwarah, E., & Jackson, S.
Affiliations
John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Price, Natalia
Venue
Menopause International
Published
2008-12
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
145-148
ISSN
1754-0453 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964864945
Cited by
39
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Menopause international (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Ureteral procedures and complications
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, reoperation, surgical outcomes, prolapse recurrence, pelvic floor surgery, women's health
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Recurrence, Reoperation, Uterine Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review